Publication: Consent and Community Engagement in diverse research contexts: Reviewing and developing research and practice
Issued Date
2013-10-01
Resource Type
ISSN
15562654
15562646
15562646
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84887422411
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. Vol.8, No.4 (2013), 1-18
Suggested Citation
Susan Bull, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Khin Maung Lwin, Vicki Marsh, Sassy Molyneux, Michael Parker, Sally Theobald, Sunita Bandewar, Gabriela Calazans, Tamara Chipasula, Kheng Chheng, Alun Davies, Michael Dunn, M. A. Faiz, John Imrie, Dorcas Kamuya, Angeliki Kerasidou, James V. Lavery, Graham Lindegger, Eleanor MacPherson, Charles T. Muga, Stephen Nakibinge, Paul Ndebele, John Sadalaki, Janet Seeley, Mark Sheehan, Rhian Twine, Jantina De Vries Consent and Community Engagement in diverse research contexts: Reviewing and developing research and practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. Vol.8, No.4 (2013), 1-18. doi:10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.1 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/32778
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Consent and Community Engagement in diverse research contexts: Reviewing and developing research and practice
Author(s)
Susan Bull
Phaik Yeong Cheah
Khin Maung Lwin
Vicki Marsh
Sassy Molyneux
Michael Parker
Sally Theobald
Sunita Bandewar
Gabriela Calazans
Tamara Chipasula
Kheng Chheng
Alun Davies
Michael Dunn
M. A. Faiz
John Imrie
Dorcas Kamuya
Angeliki Kerasidou
James V. Lavery
Graham Lindegger
Eleanor MacPherson
Charles T. Muga
Stephen Nakibinge
Paul Ndebele
John Sadalaki
Janet Seeley
Mark Sheehan
Rhian Twine
Jantina De Vries
Phaik Yeong Cheah
Khin Maung Lwin
Vicki Marsh
Sassy Molyneux
Michael Parker
Sally Theobald
Sunita Bandewar
Gabriela Calazans
Tamara Chipasula
Kheng Chheng
Alun Davies
Michael Dunn
M. A. Faiz
John Imrie
Dorcas Kamuya
Angeliki Kerasidou
James V. Lavery
Graham Lindegger
Eleanor MacPherson
Charles T. Muga
Stephen Nakibinge
Paul Ndebele
John Sadalaki
Janet Seeley
Mark Sheehan
Rhian Twine
Jantina De Vries
Other Contributor(s)
University of Oxford
Mahidol University
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit
KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Research Programme
Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
University of Toronto
Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP
Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust (MW)
Angkor Hospital for Children (AHC)
Dev Care Foundation
University of KwaZulu-Natal
UCL
Kenya Medical Research Institute
AIDS Healthcare Foundation
Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe
The Colleges of Medicine of South Africa
MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS
University of East Anglia
University of Witwatersrand
University of Cape Town
Mahidol University
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit
KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Research Programme
Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
University of Toronto
Universidade de Sao Paulo - USP
Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust (MW)
Angkor Hospital for Children (AHC)
Dev Care Foundation
University of KwaZulu-Natal
UCL
Kenya Medical Research Institute
AIDS Healthcare Foundation
Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe
The Colleges of Medicine of South Africa
MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS
University of East Anglia
University of Witwatersrand
University of Cape Town
Abstract
Consent and community engagement (CE) in health research are two aspects of a single concern-that research is carried out in a respectful manner where social value is maximized. There are important overlaps and interdependencies between consent and CE; for example, CE can provide insights into how best to tailor consent to context and can be an important component of consent processes. Engaging communities can also have intrinsic and instrumental value beyond consent; for example, as a means of showing respect and identifying appropriate ways of working respectfully. In this paper we critically examine how CE and consent processes are characterized, conducted, and evaluated in diverse health research contexts, and propose a preliminary research agenda to support future learning in these critical areas.