Publication:
Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia

dc.contributor.authorGiuseppe Saglioen_US
dc.contributor.authorDong Wook Kimen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurapol Issaragrisilen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhilipp Le Coutreen_US
dc.contributor.authorGabriel Etienneen_US
dc.contributor.authorClarisse Loboen_US
dc.contributor.authorRicardo Pasquinien_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard E. Clarken_US
dc.contributor.authorAndreas Hochhausen_US
dc.contributor.authorTimothy P. Hughesen_US
dc.contributor.authorNeil Gallagheren_US
dc.contributor.authorAlbert Hoenekoppen_US
dc.contributor.authorMei Dongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAriful Haqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard A. Larsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorHagop M. Kantarjianen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversita degli Studi di Torinoen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Catholic University of Koreaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlinen_US
dc.contributor.otherInstitut Bergonieen_US
dc.contributor.otherInstituto Estadual de Hematologia Arthur de Siqueira Cavalcantien_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversidade Federal do Paranaen_US
dc.contributor.otherRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trusten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitatsklinikum Jena und Medizinische Fakultaten_US
dc.contributor.otherRoyal Adelaide Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherNovartis International AGen_US
dc.contributor.otherNovartis Pharmaceuticalsen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Chicagoen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T09:26:18Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T09:26:18Z
dc.date.issued2010-06-17en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Nilotinib has been shown to be a more potent inhibitor of BCR-ABL than imatinib. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib, as compared with imatinib, in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study, we assigned 846 patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nilotinib (at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily) or imatinib (at a dose of 400 mg once daily). The primary end point was the rate of major molecular response at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the rates of major molecular response for nilotinib (44% for the 300-mg dose and 43% for the 400-mg dose) were nearly twice that for imatinib (22%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of complete cytogenetic response by 12 months were significantly higher for nilotinib (80% for the 300-mg dose and 78% for the 400-mg dose) than for imatinib (65%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Patients receiving either the 300-mg dose or the 400-mg dose of nilotinib twice daily had a significant improvement in the time to progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis, as compared with those receiving imatinib (P=0.01 and P=0.004, respectively). No patient with progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis had a major molecular response. Gastrointestinal and fluid-retention events were more frequent among patients receiving imatinib, whereas dermatologic events and headache were more frequent in those receiving nilotinib. Discontinuations due to aminotransferase and bilirubin elevations were low in all three study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nilotinib at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily was superior to imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00471497.) Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNew England Journal of Medicine. Vol.362, No.24 (2010), 2251-2259en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa0912614en_US
dc.identifier.issn15334406en_US
dc.identifier.issn00284793en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-77953691179en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/29624
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77953691179&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleNilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77953691179&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections