Publication:
Transcranial direct current stimulation for spinal cord injury-associated neuropathic pain

dc.contributor.authorCaixia Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorSukunya Jirachaipitaken_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul Wrigleyen_US
dc.contributor.authorHua Xuen_US
dc.contributor.authorPramote Euasobhonen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of Sydney Northern Clinical Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of Sydneyen_US
dc.contributor.otherShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:10:02Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:10:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractSeveral types of pain occur following spinal cord injury (SCI); however, neuropathic pain (NP) is one of the most intractable. Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques have been studied in clinical trials to treat chronic NP following SCI. The evidence for invasive stimulation including motor cortex and deep brain stimulation via the use of implanted electrodes to reduce SCI-related NP remains limited, due to the small scale of existing studies. The lower risk of complications associated with non-invasive stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), provide potentially attractive alternative central neuromodulation techniques. Compared to rTMS, tDCS is technically easier to apply, more affordable, available, and potentially feasible for home use. Accordingly, several new studies have investigated the efficacy of tDCS to treat NP after SCI. In this review, articles relating to the mechanisms, clinical efficacy and safety of tDCS on SCI-related NP were searched from inception to December 2019. Six clinical trials, including five randomized placebo-controlled trials and one prospective controlled trial, were included for evidence specific to the efficacy of tDCS for treating SCI-related NP. The mechanisms of action of tDCS are complex and not fully understood. Several factors including stimulation parameters and individual patient characteristics may affect the efficacy of tDCS intervention. Current evidence to support the efficacy of utilizing tDCS for relieving chronic NP after SCI remains limited. Further strong evidence is needed to confirm the efficacy of tDCS intervention for treating SCI-related NP.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKorean Journal of Pain. Vol.34, No.2 (2021), 156-164en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3344/KJP.2021.34.2.156en_US
dc.identifier.issn20930569en_US
dc.identifier.issn20059159en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85104961620en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78761
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104961620&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleTranscranial direct current stimulation for spinal cord injury-associated neuropathic painen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104961620&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections