Publication:
Global perspectives on brief cognitive assessments for dementia diagnosis

dc.contributor.authorElena Tsoyen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlissa Bernstein Sidemanen_US
dc.contributor.authorStefanie D. Piña Escuderoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaritza Pintado-Caipaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuchanan Kanjanapongen_US
dc.contributor.authorTala Al-Rousanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLingani Mbakile-Mahlanzaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaira Okada De Oliveiraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMyriam De La Cruz Pueblaen_US
dc.contributor.authorStelios Zygourisen_US
dc.contributor.authorAya Ashour Mohameden_US
dc.contributor.authorHany Ibrahimen_US
dc.contributor.authorCollette A. Goodeen_US
dc.contributor.authorBruce L. Milleren_US
dc.contributor.authorVictor Valcouren_US
dc.contributor.authorKatherine L. Possinen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, San Franciscoen_US
dc.contributor.otherTrinity College Dublinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:07:31Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:07:31Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Timely diagnosis of dementia is a global healthcare priority, particularly in low to middle income countries where rapid increases in older adult populations are expected. Objective: To investigate global perspectives on the role of brief cognitive assessments (BCAs) in dementia diagnosis, strengths and limitations of existing measures, and future directions and needs. Methods: This is a qualitative study of 18 dementia experts from different areas of the world. Participants were selected using purposeful sampling based on the following criteria: 1) practicing in countries with projected growth of older adult population of over 100%by 2050; 2) expertise in dementia diagnosis and treatment; 3) involvement in clinical practice and training; and 4) recognition as a national dementia expert based on leadership positions within healthcare system, research, and/or policy work. Participants were individually interviewed in their language of choice over secure videoconference sessions. Interviews were analyzed by a multidisciplinary team using theme identification approach. Results: Four domains with subthemes emerged illustrating participants' perspectives: 1) strengths of BCAs; 2) limitations of BCAs; 3) needs related to the use of BCAs; and 4) characteristics of an ideal BCA. While most experts agreed that BCAs were important and useful for dementia diagnosis, the themes emphasized the need for development and validation of novel measures that are sensitive, psychometrically sound, and culturally appropriate. Conclusion: BCAs are important for guiding diagnosis and care for dementia patients. Findings provide a roadmap for novel BCA development to assist in diagnostic decision making for clinicians serving a rapidly growing and diverse dementia population.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Alzheimer's Disease. Vol.82, No.3 (2021), 1001-1013en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/JAD-201403en_US
dc.identifier.issn18758908en_US
dc.identifier.issn13872877en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85112102314en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78666
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112102314&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titleGlobal perspectives on brief cognitive assessments for dementia diagnosisen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112102314&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections