Publication:
Safety of patients with conventional pacemaker system and MRI-conditional pacemaker system undergo magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] at Ramathibodi hospital

dc.contributor.authorAlisara Anannaben_US
dc.contributor.authorTachapong Ngarmukosen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirin Apiyasawaten_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherCentral Chest Institute of Thailanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:50:59Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:50:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Background: MRI-conditional pacemaker system has been safely used in clinical practice worldwide. However, there are many patients with conventional pacemaker system need magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] evaluation with strong clinical indication that benefit of MRI outweighs the risks. Objective: To investigate the safety of conventional pacemaker system and MRI-conditional pacemaker system in MRI scanning in term of the adverse occurrence such as a) a significant change in pacing capture threshold [PCT] of any leads, b) abnormal pacemaker function, and c) major adverse clinical event. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of consecutive pacemaker patients that underwent MRI at 1.5 Tesla and estimated specific absorption rate [SAR] of less than 2.0 W/kg, under institution safety protocol, between August 2012 and June 2014, was done. Results: Sixteen patients (mean age 77.6 years old, 50% male) with a total of 32 leads and 16 pulse generators underwent MRI between August 2012 and June 2014 were included. Of all patients, eight (50%) were MRI-conditional pacemaker system, and five (31%) were pacemaker-dependent. The majority of MRI scanning position was brain (8, 50%), followed by spine (6, 37.5%) and others (2, 12.5%), which included upper abdomen and lower limb. Unintended cardiac stimulation induced by magnet occurred in one patient with conventional pacemaker system without significant clinical consequences. There was no other MRI-related complication during and after the scan. At six months follow-up, 12 patients had their pacemaker evaluated. There was no occurrence of significant change in PCT or abnormal pacemaker function found at six months follow-up. Conclusion: Patients with conventional pacemaker system who have strong clinical indication for MRI may safely undergo the scan with close and continuous monitoring strategy.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.101, No.8 (2018), 1127-1132en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85052211437en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46458
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85052211437&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSafety of patients with conventional pacemaker system and MRI-conditional pacemaker system undergo magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] at Ramathibodi hospitalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85052211437&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections