Publication:
Comparison of 2 root surface area measurement methods: 3-dimensional laser scanning and cone-beam computed tomography

dc.contributor.authorJintana Tasanapanonten_US
dc.contributor.authorJanya Apisariyakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorTanapan Wattanachaien_US
dc.contributor.authorPatiyut Sriwilasen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarit Midtbøen_US
dc.contributor.authorDhirawat Jotikasthiraen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitetet i Bergenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T07:25:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:03:35Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T07:25:20Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:03:35Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the use of 3-dimensional (3D) laser scanning and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as methods of root surface measurement. Materials and Methods: Thirty teeth (15 maxillary first premolars and 15 mandibular first premolars) from 8 patients who required extractions for orthodontic treatment were selected. Before extraction, pre-treatment CBCT images of all the patients were recorded. First, a CBCT image was imported into simulation software (Mimics version 15.01; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) and the root surface area of each tooth was calculated using 3-Matic (version 7.01, Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). After extraction, all the teeth were scanned and the root surface area of each extracted tooth was calculated. The root surface areas calculated using these 2 measurement methods were analyzed using the paired t-test (P < .05). Correlations between the 2 methods were determined by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess intraobserver reliability. Results: The root surface area measurements (230.11±41.97 mm2) obtained using CBCT were slightly greater than those (229.31±42.46 mm2) obtained using 3D laser scanning, but not significantly (P=.425). A high Pearson correlation coefficient was found between the CBCT and the 3D laser scanner measurements. The intraobserver ICC was 1.000 for 3D laser scanning and 0.990 for CBCT. Conclusion: This study presents a novel CBCT approach for measuring the root surface area; this technique can be used for estimating the root surface area of non-extracted teeth.en_US
dc.identifier.citationImaging Science in Dentistry. Vol.47, No.2 (2017), 117-122en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5624/isd.2017.47.2.117en_US
dc.identifier.issn22337830en_US
dc.identifier.issn22337822en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85021385394en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/42541
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85021385394&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.titleComparison of 2 root surface area measurement methods: 3-dimensional laser scanning and cone-beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85021385394&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections