Publication: Factors limiting the current distribution of the introduced Java sparrow (Lonchura oryzivora) in Bangkok, Thailand
Issued Date
2019-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
02172445
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85075600757
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. Vol.67, (2019), 448-458
Suggested Citation
Vattikorn Sophonrat, Philip D. Round, Tommaso Savini, George A. Gale Factors limiting the current distribution of the introduced Java sparrow (Lonchura oryzivora) in Bangkok, Thailand. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. Vol.67, (2019), 448-458. doi:10.26107/RBZ-2019-0036 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49849
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Factors limiting the current distribution of the introduced Java sparrow (Lonchura oryzivora) in Bangkok, Thailand
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© National University of Singapore. Alien species invasions are often characterised by stages: Transport, introduction, establishment, and finally invasive spread, but not all established alien species succeed in expanding, and reasons for their differing relative success are not well documented. Although widely introduced, the Java sparrow (Lonchura oryzivora) is endangered in its native range (Java and Bali). Free-ranging Java sparrows were first reported in northern Bangkok, Thailand, 90+ years ago. They have an established breeding population, but have not spread beyond this area. We investigated the present distribution, habitat use, and nest survival of the Java sparrow population in Bangkok to obtain a greater understanding regarding its lack of expansion. Forty-one 400 ha grid cells were randomly selected from northern Bangkok, a primarily urban area interspersed with paddyfields. Field surveys were conducted February 2017–July 2017 and nest observations during August 2016–August 2017. Java sparrows were detected in 37.5% of grid cells, but the detection rate was low (2.8% of surveys). Models suggested that Java sparrows preferred areas with smaller paddyfields closer to roosting sites rather than larger patches of paddyfields further from nesting or roosting sites. All nest cavities were in buildings or other artificial structures; roosts were in trees. Nest survival was 49%. However >50% (41 of 78) of nesting attempts were abandoned; they were also displaced from five of 67 nest sites by native species. Lack of expansion was possibly caused by low reproductive rates, perhaps exacerbated by nest-site competition from native species. Given the low probability of invasive spread and relative similarity of bird communities in Bangkok and in the Java sparrow’s native range, this Bangkok population may have potential conservation value as reintroduction stock for the species.