Publication: Effectiveness of surgical hand scrub solutions
Issued Date
1986-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
02583186
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-0022589254
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Southeast Asian Journal of Surgery. Vol.9, No.1 (1986), 96-100
Suggested Citation
R. Phimolsarnti, S. Kongsamrarn, K. Limwongse Effectiveness of surgical hand scrub solutions. Southeast Asian Journal of Surgery. Vol.9, No.1 (1986), 96-100. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/9814
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Effectiveness of surgical hand scrub solutions
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
A prospective randomized study of three popular hand scrub solutions was carried out to determine the effectiveness of antisepsis. The 3-minute scrub and 'no brush' hand rub techniques were also evaluated. G-11 hexachlorophene was found to be inappropriate as a surgical scrub due to its failure to decontaminate during the hand scrubbing and storage in its own dispenser in the operating room. Chlorhexidine 4% (Hibiscrub) and povidone-iodine 7.5% (Betadine scrub) were both equally effective during storage in dispensers. Chlorhexidine was more effective than povidone-iodine both during a straight 3-minute scrub (p=0.0007) and during a 3-minute scrub following a 3-minute hand rub (p=0.0051). The 3-minute hand rub 'no brush' technique, in spite of claims of adequate decontamination, reduced bacterial flora by only 84% in this study. The use of the 3-minute hand scrub significantly reduced the hand bacterial flora (p=0.00154) and seemed to be a better technique. Our study did not support the use of the two consecutive 3-minute scrub technique.