Publication:
The feasibility of the 1-h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T algorithm to rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction in Thai emergency patients: An observational study

dc.contributor.authorOnlak Ruangsomboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPattaraporn Mekavuthikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorTipa Chakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorApichaya Monsomboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNattakarn Prapruetkiten_US
dc.contributor.authorUsapan Surabenjawongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChok Limsuwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSattha Riyapanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWansiri Chaisirinen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:39:46Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:39:46Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-22en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Author(s). Background: The 3-h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) algorithm is the most commonly used scheme to diagnose acute myocardial infarction. The 1-h hs-cTnT algorithm has recently been approved by the European Society of Cardiology as an alternative algorithm for earlier diagnosis. If the hs-cTnT test cannot discriminate the diagnosis of the patient at 1 h, the patient is defined as observational group. Their test must be repeated at 3 h. A high prevalence of this group may indicate a low clinical utility of the 1-h hs-cTnT algorithm. This study was aimed to estimate the proportion of the observational group in Thai emergency department (ED) patients and also the time to rule-in/out between both the algorithms. Methods: A historical control study was conducted in patients with chest pain for 1-12 h at the ED of Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The study compared two groups: one prospective group of all patients evaluated with the 1-h hs-cTnT algorithm between June and September 2017 and one historical control group evaluated with the 3-h hs-cTnT algorithm between January and March 2017. Results: A total of 130 patients were included (3-h hs-cTnT algorithm group n = 65 and 1-h hs-cTnT algorithm group n = 65). Twelve patients [18.5% (95% CI 10.0-30.1)] were categorized as observational group in the 1-h hs-cTnT algorithm group. The mean rule-in/out times in the 3-h hs-cTnT algorithm and 1-h hs-cTnT algorithm groups were 238 min (SD 63.3) and 134 min (SD 68.5), respectively (both p < 0.001). The time to disposition was also shortened in the 1-h hs-cTnT algorithm group (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis performed to identify and adjust for confounders among patient characteristics revealed no significant confounders. Conclusions: The use of the 1-h hs-cTnT algorithm in the ED resulted in an acceptable proportion in the observational group and a decreased time to rule-in/out compared with the 3-h hs-cTnT algorithm.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Emergency Medicine. Vol.11, No.1 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12245-018-0204-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn18651380en_US
dc.identifier.issn18651372en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85055330338en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46245
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055330338&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe feasibility of the 1-h high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T algorithm to rule-in and rule-out acute myocardial infarction in Thai emergency patients: An observational studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055330338&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections