Publication:
Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury

dc.contributor.authorNatsinee Athinartrattanapongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChaiyaporn Yuksenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSittichok Leela-Amornsinen_US
dc.contributor.authorChetsadakon Jenpanitpongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirote Wongwaisayawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPittavat Leelapattanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:10:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:10:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Cervical spine fracture is approximately 2%-5%. Diagnostic imaging in developing countries has several limitations. A computed tomography scan is not available 24 hours and not cost-effective. This study aims to develop a clinical tool to identify patients who must undergo a computed tomography scan to evaluate cervical spine fracture in a noncomputed tomography scan availablehospital. Methods. The study was a diagnostic prediction rule. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, at the emergency department. This study included all patients aged over 16 years who had suspected cervical spine injury and underwent a computed tomography scan at the emergency department. The predictive model and prediction scores were developed via multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results. 375 patients met the criteria. 29 (7.73%) presented with cervical spine fracture on computed tomography scan and 346 did not. Five independent factors (i.e., high-risk mechanism of injury, paraparesis, paresthesia, limited range of motion of the neck, and associated chest or facial injury) were considered good predictors of C-spine fracture. The clinical prediction score for C-spine fracture was developed by dividing the patients into three probability groups (low, 0; moderate, 1-5; and high, 6-11), and the accuracy was 82.52%. In patients with a score of 1-5, the positive likelihood ratio for C-spine fracture was1.46. Meanwhile, those with a score of 6-11 had an LR+ of 7.16. Conclusion. In a noncomputed tomography scan available hospital, traumatic spine injuries patients with a clinical prediction score ≥1 were associated with cervical spine fracture and should undergo computed tomography scan to evaluate C-spine fracture.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNeurology Research International. Vol.2021, (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2021/6658679en_US
dc.identifier.issn20901860en_US
dc.identifier.issn20901852en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85103675456en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78775
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103675456&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titlePrediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injuryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103675456&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections