Publication:
Judicial activism and human rights in India: A critical appraisal

dc.contributor.authorPayel Rai Chowdhuryen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T08:45:18Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T08:45:18Z
dc.date.issued2011-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe responsibilities that a court carries in a country with a written constitution are very onerous - much more onerous than the responsibilities of a court without a written constitution. Because here, they do not just interpret the laws but also the provisions of the constitution, and, are thus entrusted with giving meaning to the cold letter of the constitution. The courts thus act as the supreme interpreter, protector and guardian of the supremacy of the constitution by keeping all authorities - legislative, executive, administrative, judicial or quasi-judicial - within legal bounds. The judiciary has the responsibility to scrutinise all governmental actions and it goes without saying that in a constitution having provisions guaranteeing fundamental rights of the people, the judiciary has the power as well as the obligation to protect the people's rights from any undue and unjustified encroachment. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Human Rights. Vol.15, No.7 (2011), 1055-1071en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13642987.2010.482912en_US
dc.identifier.issn1744053Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn13642987en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84859185854en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/12876
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859185854&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleJudicial activism and human rights in India: A critical appraisalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859185854&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections