Publication:
Intraoperative navigation for single-splint two-jaw orthognathic surgery: From model to actual surgery

dc.contributor.authorHsin Wen Changen_US
dc.contributor.authorHsiu Hsia Linen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeerasak Chortrakarnkijen_US
dc.contributor.authorSun Goo Kimen_US
dc.contributor.authorLun Jou Loen_US
dc.contributor.otherChang Gung Memorial Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSeran Plastic Surgery Clinicen_US
dc.contributor.otherChang Gung Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T10:03:50Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T10:03:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Objective This study reported an intraoperative navigation system for single-splint two-jaw orthognathic surgery, and assessed the accuracy of transferring the computer assisted surgical simulation. Methods A skull model was used for validation, and twenty patients receiving such procedure were enrolled. The procedure contained five phases, including virtual surgery on three-dimensional images, fabrication of surgical positioning guides, preparation of registration and validation landmarks, confirmation of bony position during surgery, and postoperative assessment. Target registration error (TRE) and differences between simulation (T0) and postoperative images (T1) were measured from landmarks to Frankfort horizontal plane (FHP), mid-sagittal plane (MSP), and coronal plane (COP). Results For the model experiment, mean TRE was lowest using the hard tissue landmarks (0.60 ± 0.27 mm), and the mean difference (T1-T0) was less than 1 mm to all three planes. For the patients, mean TRE was 1.07 ± 0.18 mm from the hard tissue landmarks. The mean difference was 0.96. ± 0.60 mm from MSP, 1.39 ± 1.11 mm from FHP, and 2.12 ± 1.82 mm from COP. The differences were not significant. Both surgeons and patients were satisfied with the surgical outcome. Conclusion This study showed that the navigation system had acceptable accuracy and was useful for the two-jaw orthognathic surgery using single-splint method.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol.43, No.7 (2015), 1119-1126en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.009en_US
dc.identifier.issn18784119en_US
dc.identifier.issn10105182en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84939464735en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/35878
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84939464735&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.titleIntraoperative navigation for single-splint two-jaw orthognathic surgery: From model to actual surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84939464735&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections