Publication:
Randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of usual gas release, active aspiration, and passive-valve release on abdominal distension in patients who have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy

dc.contributor.authorWarisara Tuvayanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPotchanee Silchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorYongyut Sirivatanauksornen_US
dc.contributor.authorPorntita Visavajarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaruwan Pungdoken_US
dc.contributor.authorSununtha Tonklaien_US
dc.contributor.authorThawatchai Akaraviputhen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:50:00Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:50:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. INTRODUCTION: Residual, intra-abdominal CO2 contributes to abdominal distension and pain after laparoscopic surgery. The study was designed to assess recovery after gas release in patients who have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: A total of 142 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into three groups: (i) group 1 (control group), gas release from the surgical wound without port release (n = 47); (ii) group 2, active gas aspiration via a subdiaphragmatic port (n = 48); and (iii) group 3, passive-valve release via a subdiaphragmatic port valve opening (n = 47). Abdominal distension and shoulder pain levels were assessed postoperatively. RESULTS: The active aspiration group had significantly reduced postoperative abdominal distensions at 30 min, 4, and 24 h compared with the control group (50.0% vs 80.9%, 43.8% vs 76.6%, 33.3% vs 57.4%, respectively; P < 0.05). Similarly, the passive-valve release group had significantly reduced postoperative abdominal distensions at 4 and 24 h compared with the control group (51.1% vs 76.6%, 57.4% vs 36.2%; P < 0.05). Both intervention groups had significantly reduced postoperative shoulder pain at 4 and 24 h compared with the control group (P < 0.001). In addition, the postoperative ambulation times for the active aspiration group were significantly shorter than those for the control and passive-valve release groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Releasing residual CO2 from the intra-abdominal cavity at the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by either the active aspiration or passive-valve release technique is an effective way to reduce postoperative abdominal distension and shoulder pain.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian journal of endoscopic surgery. Vol.11, No.3 (2018), 212-219en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ases.12451en_US
dc.identifier.issn17585910en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85061291806en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46439
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061291806&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRandomized controlled trial comparing the effects of usual gas release, active aspiration, and passive-valve release on abdominal distension in patients who have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061291806&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections