Publication: Determination of the thecal sac ending using magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical applications in craniospinal irradiation
Issued Date
2004-11-01
Resource Type
ISSN
01252208
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-13744256032
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.87, No.11 (2004), 1368-1373
Suggested Citation
Sith Phongkitkarun, Suphaneewan Jaovisidha, Mantana Dhanachai Determination of the thecal sac ending using magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical applications in craniospinal irradiation. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.87, No.11 (2004), 1368-1373. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/21498
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Determination of the thecal sac ending using magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical applications in craniospinal irradiation
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Purpose: To determine level of the thecal sac ending in unaffected individuals of young age-group and in patients with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) seeding tumor using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Material and Method: MRI of the lumbosacral spine of 253 cases (age range 1-40 years) had been reviewed. Of these, 20 cases were known having CSF seeding tumors. Two hundred and thirty-three cases of unaffected individuals were used as control group. Sagittal MR images were used to determine the level of thecal sac ending by referencing on the corresponding vertebral body and intervertebral disc. Results: The range of the thecal sac ending level in unaffected population varied from the lower one-third of LS to the middle one-third of S3. About 97% of cases, the distal end of thecal sac terminated at the S2-3 intervertebral disc space or higher. In patients with CSF seeding tumor, the range of thecal sac ending was from the middle one-third of LS to the S2-3 intervertebral disc space. There was no statistically significant difference of thecal ending level between unaffected group and patients with CSF seeding tumors (p=0.19). Conclusion: Placing inferior border of radiation field at the middle one-third of S3 vertebra would help to cover the entire subarachnoid space in all cases. Without MR machine, this study may be used as a general guideline for placing the inferior border for spinal irradiation.