Publication:
Effect of costing methods on unit cost of hospital medical services

dc.contributor.authorArthorn Riewpaiboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaranya Malarojeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSukalaya Kongsawatten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T01:53:51Z
dc.date.available2018-08-24T01:53:51Z
dc.date.issued2007-04-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To explore the variance of unit costs of hospital medical services due to different costing methods employed in the analysis. Methods: Retrospective and descriptive study at Kaengkhoi District Hospital, Saraburi Province, Thailand, in the fiscal year 2002. The process started with a calculation of unit costs of medical services as a base case. After that, the unit costs were re-calculated based on various methods. Finally, the variations of the results obtained from various methods and the base case were computed and compared. Results: The total annualized capital cost of buildings and capital items calculated by the accounting-based approach (averaging the capital purchase prices throughout their useful life) was 13.02% lower than that calculated by the economic-based approach (combination of depreciation cost and interest on undepreciated portion over the useful life). A change of discount rate from 3% to 6% results in a 4.76% increase of the hospital's total annualized capital cost. When the useful life of durable goods was changed from 5 to 10 years, the total annualized capital cost of the hospital decreased by 17.28% from that of the base case. Regarding alternative criteria of indirect cost allocation, unit cost of medical services changed by a range of -6.99% to +4.05%. We explored the effect on unit cost of medical services in one department. Various costing methods, including departmental allocation methods, ranged between -85% and +32% against those of the base case. Based on the variation analysis, the economic-based approach was suitable for capital cost calculation. For the useful life of capital items, appropriate duration should be studied and standardized. Regarding allocation criteria, single-output criteria might be more efficient than the combined-output and complicated ones. For the departmental allocation methods, micro-costing method was the most suitable method at the time of study. Conclusions: These different costing methods should be standardized and developed as guidelines since they could affect implementation of the national health insurance scheme and health financing management. © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTropical Medicine and International Health. Vol.12, No.4 (2007), 554-563en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01815.xen_US
dc.identifier.issn13653156en_US
dc.identifier.issn13602276en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-34247344502en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/24563
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34247344502&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffect of costing methods on unit cost of hospital medical servicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34247344502&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections