Publication:
Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly: Results from the Thai National Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry (TPCIR)

dc.contributor.authorSongsak Kiatchoosakunen_US
dc.contributor.authorPattarapong Keelapangen_US
dc.contributor.authorPinij Kaewsuwanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChunhakasem Chotinaiwattarakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorChumphol Piumsomboonen_US
dc.contributor.otherKhon Kaen Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiengmai-Rama Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMaharaja Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPramongkutklao Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T09:19:02Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T09:19:02Z
dc.date.issued2010-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAims: The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and identify the risk factors of in-hospital mortality among elderly patients undergoing PCI in Thailand. Methods and results: Included in this study were 4,156 consecutive patients (comprising 639 elderly [age W75 years] and 3,517 non-elderly [age <75 years]) undergoing PCI between May 2006 and October 2007. The success rate of PCI was less favourable among elderly compared to the non-elderly patients (91.2% vs. 87.5%; p=0.003). Elderly patients had higher rate of post PCI renal failure (3.9% vs. 1.8%; p=0.001), Q-wave myocardial infarction (3.0 vs. 1.4%, p=0.003), and unadjusted in-hospital mortality (5.3% vs. 2.4%, p≤0.001), compared with non-elderly patients. After adjustment for baseline variables, acute coronary syndrome and heart failure were the two variables most associated with increased mortality (OR=5.95, 95% CI=3.22-11.01), p<0.001 and OR=5.73,95% CI=3.80-8.63), p<0.001, respectively). According to the multivariate analysis, age was not significantly related with increased mortality (OR=1.37, 95% CI=0.87-2.16, p=0.174). Conclusions: Our study highlights the safety and effectiveness of PCI in elderly patients since advanced age is not a predictor of in-hospital mortality. © Europa Edition 2010. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuroIntervention. Vol.6, No.5 (2010), 611-615en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4244/EIJV6I5A102en_US
dc.identifier.issn19696213en_US
dc.identifier.issn1774024Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-79952278541en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/29486
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79952278541&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePercutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly: Results from the Thai National Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry (TPCIR)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79952278541&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections