Publication: Perceived stigma of leprosy among community members and health care providers in Lalitpur district of Nepal: A qualitative study
Issued Date
2018-12-01
Resource Type
ISSN
19326203
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85059242846
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PLoS ONE. Vol.13, No.12 (2018)
Suggested Citation
Sujan Babu Marahatta, Rakchya Amatya, Srijana Adhikari, Deena Giri, Sarina Lama, Nils Kaehler, Komal Raj Rijal, Suchana Marahatta, Bipin Adhikari Perceived stigma of leprosy among community members and health care providers in Lalitpur district of Nepal: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE. Vol.13, No.12 (2018). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209676 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/44632
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Perceived stigma of leprosy among community members and health care providers in Lalitpur district of Nepal: A qualitative study
Abstract
© 2018 Marahatta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background: Leprosy remains a major stigmatizing condition. Stigma is a dynamic process resulting from the interaction between physical attributes caused by leprosy and the existing stereotypes in a community. Leprosy has pervasive impacts on all areas of life including psychosocial burden to an individual, social interaction, marriage, and employment. These impacts vary and are largely dependent on a particular culture and community. The main objective of this study was to explore the perceived stigma of leprosy amongst community members and health care providers in Lalitpur district of Nepal. Methods: A total of six focused group discussions (FGDs) with 43 participants from a community living close to Anandaban Leprosy Hospital and ten semi structured interviews (SSIs) with health care providers were conducted between October and December 2016. An interview guide was used for the FGDs and SSIs. All qualitative data were transcribed and translated into English and were thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti software. Results: Visible deformities due to leprosy was one of the major contributing factors for stigma. Stigma was further exacerbated by an attitude to conceal the disease due to perceived fear of potential discrimination. While over the years, stigma was felt to be decreasing, various aspects of life were still affected by leprosy stigma including marriage, employment and social interaction. This was largely attributed to leprosy and its consequences, specifically the disability and deformity caused by leprosy. Conclusion: Leprosy was still perceived to be feared and concealed because of potential discrimination, even within the community that was close to a long established leprosy hospital. Various aspects such as marriage, employment and social interaction were still affected by the stigma which was strongly associated with visible deformities. In addition to ongoing rehabilitation and stigma reduction programs, integrating strategies such as community engagement wherein community and leprosy affected person jointly take a role in stigma reduction programs can be helpful.