Publication:
Comparison of shear bond strengths between a mica-based glass-ceramic and human dentin using three different resin cements

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorThapanee Srichumpongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKallaya Suputtamongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorNoparat Thongpunen_US
dc.contributor.authorPimnida Phokhinchatchananen_US
dc.contributor.authorSukanda Angkulpipaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSahadsaya Prasertwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorGiovanni Bolellien_US
dc.contributor.authorPaolo Veronesien_US
dc.contributor.authorCristina Leonellien_US
dc.contributor.authorGreg Henessen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuangrudee Chaysuwanen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Technology Sydneyen_US
dc.contributor.otherKasetsart Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversità degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emiliaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:09:18Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:09:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-15en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Australian Ceramic Society. Three resin cements, RelyX™ Ultimate, Panavia F2.0 and RelyX™ U200, were evaluated for their bond strengths between a mica glass-ceramic and human dentin. This research shows that a self-etch dental cement resin system, Panavia F2.0 provided the best bond strength. The glass-ceramic was produced and phases analysed. Biaxial flexural strength and hardness were measured and found to be comparable to that of human enamel and dentin. Bond strength was measured before and after thermocycling. Thermocycling was found to reduce the bond strength. Thermocycling reduced the shear bond strengths of all adhesives by 50–60%. The two-way ANOVA test was used to analyse the data (p = 0.05). Failure modes were analysed, showing failure predominately at the cement/glass-ceramic and dentin/resin cement interfaces. Failure modes changed after thermocycling. The resin cement bond between the dentin and mica glass-ceramics interfaces was examined for failure by optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Australian Ceramic Society. Vol.55, No.1 (2019), 47-55en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s41779-018-0209-0en_US
dc.identifier.issn25101579en_US
dc.identifier.issn25101560en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85061103492en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51178
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061103492&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMaterials Scienceen_US
dc.titleComparison of shear bond strengths between a mica-based glass-ceramic and human dentin using three different resin cementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85061103492&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections

Scopus 2019