Publication:
The effects of vitamin E supplementation on malondialdehyde as a biomarker of oxidative stress in haemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorPeter Berginen_US
dc.contributor.authorAoife Leggetten_US
dc.contributor.authorChris R. Cardwellen_US
dc.contributor.authorJayne V. Woodsideen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexander P. Maxwellen_US
dc.contributor.authorGareth J. McKayen_US
dc.contributor.otherRamathibodi Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherQueen's University Belfasten_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:04:41Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:04:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Haemodialysis (HD) patients tend to have higher levels of oxidative stress (OS), associated with increased morbidity and premature mortality, compared to the general population. Levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), a biomarker of OS, are reduced by the antioxidant properties of vitamin E (VE) but outcomes from randomised control trials of VE supplementation on MDA in HD patients have been inconsistent. Methods: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of adult HD patients from VE supplementation studies with measures of MDA. The following search criteria of MEDLINE and EMBASE were considered from inception to January 2020: ‘dialysis’ AND ‘Vitamin E OR tocopherol’ AND ‘malondialdehyde OR MDA’. Two reviewers independently extracted study data and assessed risk of bias. Mean MDA levels and standard deviation were determined before and after VE supplementation. Standardised mean difference (SMD) and standard error were calculated as the within person difference and units of measure were not consistently recorded across all studies. The SMD were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Results: The SMD of MDA levels from 18 comparisons was significantly lower in HD patients following VE supplementation (− 1.55; confidence interval: − 2.17 to − 0.94, P < 0.00001). There were significant levels of heterogeneity between studies (I2 value = 91%; P < 0.00001) with evidence of potential publication bias toward smaller studies. Conclusions: Our findings support the use of VE to reduce the effects of OS in HD patients although high levels of heterogeneity and variation in the methodological approaches used by some studies highlight the need for further investigation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Nephrology. Vol.22, No.1 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12882-021-02328-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712369en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85104066025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77603
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104066025&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe effects of vitamin E supplementation on malondialdehyde as a biomarker of oxidative stress in haemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104066025&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections