Publication: Prediction models of obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of model performance
Issued Date
2021-06-01
Resource Type
ISSN
20754418
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85115887665
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Diagnostics. Vol.11, No.6 (2021)
Suggested Citation
Sukanya Siriyotha, Visasiri Tantrakul, Supada Plitphonganphim, Sasivimol Rattanasiri, Ammarin Thakkinstian Prediction models of obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of model performance. Diagnostics. Vol.11, No.6 (2021). doi:10.3390/diagnostics11061097 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76143
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Prediction models of obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of model performance
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Background: Gestational obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Timely diagnosis and treatment are crucial to improve pregnancy outcomes. Conventional OSA screening questionnaires are less accurate, and various prediction models have been studied specifically during pregnancy. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed for multivariable prediction models of both development and validation involving diagnosis of OSA during pregnancy. Results: Of 1262 articles, only 6 studies (3713 participants) met the inclusion criteria and were included for review. All studies showed high risk of bias for the construct of models. The pooled C-statistics (95%CI) for development prediction models was 0.817 (0.783, 0850), I2 = 97.81 and 0.855 (0.822, 0.887), I2 = 98.06 for the first and second–third trimesters, respectively. Only multivariable apnea prediction (MVAP), and Facco models were externally validated with pooled C-statistics (95%CI) of 0.743 (0.688, 0.798), I2 = 95.84, and 0.791 (0.767, 0.815), I2 = 77.34, respectively. The most common predictors in the models were body mass index, age, and snoring, none included hypersomnolence. Conclusions: Prediction models for gestational OSA showed good performance during early and late trimesters. A high level of heterogeneity and few external validations were found indicating limitation for generalizability and the need for further studies.