Publication:
An analysis of intraoperative recall of awareness in Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study)

dc.contributor.authorMali Rungreungvanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorVarinee Lekpraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorChomchaba Sirinanen_US
dc.contributor.authorThanoo Hintongen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T08:26:00Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T08:26:00Z
dc.date.issued2005-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to analyze intraoperative awareness using database of Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) with regard to frequency, contributing factors, preventive and corrective strategies. Material and Method: Details of intraoperative recall of awareness were recorded prospectively by attending anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists in standardized record forms during February 1,2003 to July 31, 2004. Participating hospitals included 7 university hospitals, 5 tertiary care hospitals, 4 secondary care hospitals, and 4 primary care hospitals. All data were analyzed to identify contributing factors, preventive and corrective strategies. Results: Among 126078 general anesthetized cases, there were 99 cases of intraoperative recall of awareness. Awareness was found in female patients more than male patients (63% versus 37%). The majority of patients had ASA PS 1 and 2. Cardiac, obstetric, and lower abdominal surgery were involved in anesthesia awareness more than other type of surgery. Patients experiencing awareness reported sound (62%), pain (51%), feeling operated without pain (33%), and paralysis (25%). There was slight impact of anesthesia awareness in Thai patients (only 13% had temporary emotional stress and 13% had mild anxiety) despite small percentage of proper management by reassurance and psychiatric consultation (15%). The contributing factors included inadequate knowledge (67%), inadequate medication dosage (44%), and inadequate care from inexperience (11%). Awareness incidents were documented to be preventable in 36% of patients and partially preventable in 38 % of patients. The corrective strategies included guideline practice (30%), additional training (28%), quality assurance activity (19%), and improved supervision (16%). Conclusion: The incidence of intraoperative recall of awareness in this study was 0.08%. Patients reported sound, pain, feeling operated without pain, and paralysis. Corrective strategies included guideline practice, additional training, quality assurance activity, and improved supervision.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.88, No.SUPPL. 7 (2005)en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-31644436316en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/16925
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=31644436316&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAn analysis of intraoperative recall of awareness in Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=31644436316&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections