Publication:
Radiofrequency ablation of lung metastasis not suitable for surgery: Experience in siriraj hospital

dc.contributor.authorTrongtum Tongdeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPattama Tantigateen_US
dc.contributor.authorRanista Tongdeeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T10:52:11Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T10:52:11Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2015, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Background: Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is being promoted as a novel technique with low morbidity rate in treatment of inoperable lung tumor either primary lung tumor or metastatic disease. Objective: To report our experiences of RFA treated for lung metastasis in Siriraj Hospital and to evaluate the efficacy and complication of RFA. Material and Method: All patients who underwent RFA for lung metastasis at Siriraj Hospital, between January 2007 and December 2013, were included in the present study. Clinical data, pre-procedure image findings including lesion size, location, post-procedure image findings, complications, and outcome were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Fourteen patients (10 male, 4 female) with 27 lung metastasis were treated with RFA. The ablated lung nodules consist of metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 13), colorectal adenocarcinoma (n = 9), insular cell thyroid carcinoma (n = 3), and adenocarcinoma of prostate gland (n = 2). Mean patient age was 50 years (age range 28-67 years). Size of the ablated nodules range from 0.5 to 5.0 cm (median = 1.3 cm). The most common complication was pneumothorax, occurring in 71% (10 of 14 patients). Other complications included surgical site infection, atelectasis, loculated hemothorax, loculated empyema, and bronchopleural fistula, occurred in one patient each. Post-procedure image findings showed complete ablations without local tumor recurrence in 81% (22 of 27 nodules). Local tumor recurrences were seen in 19% (5 of 27 nodules). Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation for lung metastasis can be considered as a relatively safe, effective alternative treatment for lung metastasis. Risk factors that may associate with local recurrence include large size nodules and subpleural location.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.98, No.10 (2015), 1019-1027en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84945180300en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/36553
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945180300&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRadiofrequency ablation of lung metastasis not suitable for surgery: Experience in siriraj hospitalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945180300&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections