Publication: Marginal and internal fits of zirconia single crown and Four-unit Fixed Dental Prostheses Substructures.
dc.contributor.author | Kulnaree Charukietkajorn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | กุลนรี จารุเกียรติขจร | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chuchai Anunmana | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | ชูชัย อนันต์มานะ | en_US |
dc.contributor.correspondence | Chuchai Anunmana | en_US |
dc.contributor.correspondence | ชูชัย อนันต์มานะ | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-09T02:30:58Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-13T06:51:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-09T02:30:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-13T06:51:25Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-02-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To compare marginal and internal gaps of zirconia single crown substructures with those of four-unit fixed dental prostheses substructures. Materials and Methods: A standard Co-Cr model of maxillary first premolar and maxillary second molar abutments was made. Twenty polyether impressions of the standard model were taken and subsequently poured with type-IV dental stone. Zirconia substructures were fabricated as premolar and molar single crowns (Cr, n=10) and four-unit bridges (Br, n=10) using LAVA™ Zirconia system. The gaps between substructures and their standard abutments were evaluated using silicone replica technique. Twenty-two different points were measured along the marginal and internal surfaces. The differences of the gap widths between single crown and four-unit bridge substructures were analyzed using Mann Whitney U-test (α=0.05). Results: There was significant difference of marginal gap between Cr and Br groups at mesial marginal gap of molar (30±44 and 112±19 µm for Cr and Br, respectively). For the internal gaps, mid-occlusal point revealed the largest gap. No significant difference of internal gaps between Cr and Br groups was observed except at some points of mesial chamfer area of molar (123±18 and 218±33 µm for Cr and Br, respectively) and at buccal axial wall of premolar (45±15 and 76±47 µm for Cr and Br, respectively). Conclusions: The differences between the gaps of zirconia single crown and those of four-unit bridge substructures were found at the mesial side of molar marginal area. Most of internal gaps of single crown substructures did not significantly differ from those of four-unit bridge substructures | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Charukietkajorn K, Anunmana C. Marginal and internal fits of zirconia single crown and four-unit fixed dental prostheses substructures. M Dent J 2015; 35: 209-19. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0125-5614 (printed) | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/1008 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.subject | CAD-CAM | en_US |
dc.subject | Gap | en_US |
dc.subject | Zirconia | en_US |
dc.subject | Fixed dental prostheses | en_US |
dc.subject | Crown | en_US |
dc.subject | Bridge | en_US |
dc.subject | LAVA | en_US |
dc.subject | Open Access article | en_US |
dc.subject | วิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์มหิดล | |
dc.subject | Mahidol Dental Journal | |
dc.title | Marginal and internal fits of zirconia single crown and Four-unit Fixed Dental Prostheses Substructures. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2015-09-30 | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |