Publication:
Marginal and internal fits of zirconia single crown and Four-unit Fixed Dental Prostheses Substructures.

dc.contributor.authorKulnaree Charukietkajornen_US
dc.contributor.authorกุลนรี จารุเกียรติขจรen_US
dc.contributor.authorChuchai Anunmanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorชูชัย อนันต์มานะen_US
dc.contributor.correspondenceChuchai Anunmanaen_US
dc.contributor.correspondenceชูชัย อนันต์มานะen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-09T02:30:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-13T06:51:25Z
dc.date.available2016-02-09T02:30:58Z
dc.date.available2016-12-13T06:51:25Z
dc.date.created2016-02-02
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare marginal and internal gaps of zirconia single crown substructures with those of four-unit fixed dental prostheses substructures. Materials and Methods: A standard Co-Cr model of maxillary first premolar and maxillary second molar abutments was made. Twenty polyether impressions of the standard model were taken and subsequently poured with type-IV dental stone. Zirconia substructures were fabricated as premolar and molar single crowns (Cr, n=10) and four-unit bridges (Br, n=10) using LAVA™ Zirconia system. The gaps between substructures and their standard abutments were evaluated using silicone replica technique. Twenty-two different points were measured along the marginal and internal surfaces. The differences of the gap widths between single crown and four-unit bridge substructures were analyzed using Mann Whitney U-test (α=0.05). Results: There was significant difference of marginal gap between Cr and Br groups at mesial marginal gap of molar (30±44 and 112±19 µm for Cr and Br, respectively). For the internal gaps, mid-occlusal point revealed the largest gap. No significant difference of internal gaps between Cr and Br groups was observed except at some points of mesial chamfer area of molar (123±18 and 218±33 µm for Cr and Br, respectively) and at buccal axial wall of premolar (45±15 and 76±47 µm for Cr and Br, respectively). Conclusions: The differences between the gaps of zirconia single crown and those of four-unit bridge substructures were found at the mesial side of molar marginal area. Most of internal gaps of single crown substructures did not significantly differ from those of four-unit bridge substructuresen_US
dc.identifier.citationCharukietkajorn K, Anunmana C. Marginal and internal fits of zirconia single crown and four-unit fixed dental prostheses substructures. M Dent J 2015; 35: 209-19.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0125-5614 (printed)
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/1008
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderMahidol Universityen_US
dc.subjectCAD-CAMen_US
dc.subjectGapen_US
dc.subjectZirconiaen_US
dc.subjectFixed dental prosthesesen_US
dc.subjectCrownen_US
dc.subjectBridgeen_US
dc.subjectLAVAen_US
dc.subjectOpen Access articleen_US
dc.subjectวิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์มหิดล
dc.subjectMahidol Dental Journal
dc.titleMarginal and internal fits of zirconia single crown and Four-unit Fixed Dental Prostheses Substructures.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-09-30
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
dt-ar-chuchai-2015.pdf
Size:
1007.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections