Publication: Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite - A randomized clinical trial
Issued Date
2009-11-01
Resource Type
ISSN
03617734
DOI
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-70849127633
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Operative Dentistry. Vol.34, No.6 (2009), 648-655
Suggested Citation
M. F. Burrow, D. Banomyong, C. Harnirattisai, H. H. Messer Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite - A randomized clinical trial. Operative Dentistry. Vol.34, No.6 (2009), 648-655. doi:10.2341/08-098-C Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/27509
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite - A randomized clinical trial
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
This study investigated the ability of a glass-ionomer cement (GIC) lining to reduce postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite. In addition, the effects of a total-etch and self-etch adhesive on postoperative sensitivity were also compared. Patients who had moderate to deep occlusal caries of at least one molar were recruited. Overall, 103 restorations were placed in 70 participants, with an average age of 22.8 ± 3.8 years. Preoperatively, each tooth was evaluated for cold-stimulated tooth sensitivity using a visual analog scale. If present, tooth sensitivity induced by cold/hot drinks or occlusal function was also noted. Caries was stained with a caries detector dye, then removed using slow-speed burs and hand excavators. The cavity was restored with one of four randomly allocated restorative procedures: 1) bonded with a two-step, total-etch adhesive (Single Bond 2); 2) lined with a resin-modified GIC liner (Fuji Lining LC), then bonded with total-etch adhesive; 3) bonded with a two-step, self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) and 4) lined with the GIC liner, then bonded with self-etch adhesive. The cavities were incrementally filled with a nanofilled hybrid resin composite. At recall, postoperative sensitivity was evaluated at one week and one month. Overall, postoperative sensitivity in daily function was rare. No significant difference in postoperative sensitivity, either in daily function or in response to a cold stimulus, was observed between the restorative procedures with or without the GIC liner, regardless of the adhesive used (pgt;0.05). In addition, no difference in postoperative sensitivity was noted between use of the self-etch and total-etch adhesive.