Publication:
A superior test for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in Resource-Limited Settings

dc.contributor.authorDarunee Chotiprasitsakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorTavan Janvilisrien_US
dc.contributor.authorSasisopin Kiertiburanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSiriorn Watcharananunen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurang Chankhamhaengdechaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPiyapong Hadpanusen_US
dc.contributor.authorKumthorn Malathumen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T05:18:13Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T05:18:13Z
dc.date.issued2012-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this prospective cohort study, we investigated the prevalence of Clostridium difficileassociated diarrhea (CDAD) in adult patients with nosocomial diarrhea by performing enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting toxins A and B and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting the presence of the tcdB gene in stool samples. We determined the factors associated with CDAD, and the treatment outcome of CDAD from May 2010 to January 2011. A total of 175 stool samples were tested by EIA and PCR. In total, 26.9z patients tested positive for C. difficile: 12.6z by EIA and 24.0z by PCR. The kappa coefficient and total agreement of both the tests were 0.46 and 83.2z, respectively. Onset of diarrhea after antibiotic administration for 10 days or more (OR, 2.71; 95z CI, 1.14-6.44; P = 0.024) and leukocyte count > 15,000 cells/mm 3 (OR, 3.12; 95z CI, 1.24-7.88; P = 0.016) were significantly associated with occurrence of CDAD. The non-response rate to CDAD treatment was 24.1z, and the all-cause mortality rate was 31.9z in the CDAD group as against 35.9z in the non-CDAD group (P = 0.721). In our study, the performance of direct PCR of stool samples for detecting tcdB was better, with the number of positive results for stool toxins A and B being twofold higher than that in the case of EIA. Patients who have diarrhea after receiving antibiotics for 10 days or more or those who have a leukocyte count of > 15,000 cells/mm 3 should be investigated for CDAD.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJapanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. Vol.65, No.4 (2012), 326-329en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7883/yoken.65.326en_US
dc.identifier.issn18842836en_US
dc.identifier.issn13446304en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84866261524en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/15035
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84866261524&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA superior test for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in Resource-Limited Settingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84866261524&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections