Publication:
Comparison of the region-based and pixel-wise methods for cardiac T2* analysis in 50 transfusion-dependent thai thalassemia patients

dc.contributor.authorPairash Saiviroonpornen_US
dc.contributor.authorVip Viprakasiten_US
dc.contributor.authorThananya Boonyasirinanten_US
dc.contributor.authorArchrob Khuhapinanten_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn C. Wooden_US
dc.contributor.authorRungroj Krittayaphongen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThalassemia Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherDivision of Cardiologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Southern Californiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T08:32:31Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T08:32:31Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the observer variability of the conventional region-based (RB) to the typical and proposed pixel-wise (PW) methods for cardiac T2* analysis in thalassemia patients. Design AND Methods: Fifty thalassemia major patients were enrolled for the study. Short-axis bright- and black-blood sequences were acquired and analyzed using the RB and PW methods. Regions were defined using the whole septum (WS) or partial septum (PS). From the same PS region, results were reported by mean (PS-PW) and median (MPS-PW). Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were investigated on all data set by 2 independent observers blinded to the result. Results: The T2* values from the PS-PW and MPS-PW methods were comparable to the conventional WS-RB method on both scanning techniques. When comparing the interobserver variability from the WS-RB to the PS-PW method, the coefficient of variation of the PS-PW method was equivalent (4.5% vs 4.7%, P = NS) for the bright-blood technique but 31% lower (4.0% vs 2.8%, P = 0.21) for the black-blood technique. The proposed MPS-PW method performed even better with respect to the conventional WS-RB method, decreasing interobserver coefficient of variation by 24% (4.5% vs 3.5%, P = 0.08) and 42% (4.0% vs 2.4%, P = 0.02), respectively. Intraobserver reproducibility followed the same trend. Conclusions: The proposed PW method using the median of T2* values calculated from partial interventricular septum region provided lower intraobserver and interobserver variabilities compared with the conventional RB or typical PW methods. Copyright © 2011 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography. Vol.35, No.3 (2011), 375-381en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/RCT.0b013e31820eaaf2en_US
dc.identifier.issn15323145en_US
dc.identifier.issn03638715en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-79957826792en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/12528
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79957826792&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of the region-based and pixel-wise methods for cardiac T2* analysis in 50 transfusion-dependent thai thalassemia patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79957826792&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections