Publication:
Comparison of Aroma Character Impact Volatiles of Thummong Leaves (Litsea petiolata Hook. f.), Mangdana Water Beetle (Lethocerus indicus), and a Commercial Product as Flavoring Agents in Thai Traditional Cooking

dc.contributor.authorKanjana Mahattanataweeen_US
dc.contributor.authorTorsak Luanphaisarnnonten_US
dc.contributor.authorRussell Rouseffen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiam Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T10:18:36Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T10:18:36Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-14en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 American Chemical Society. Thummong (Litsea petiolata Hook. f.) is a tree native to southern Thailand. The leaves of this tree are highly aromatic and used to flavor Thai dishes in place of the traditional water beetle Mangdana (Lethocerus indicus) for religious and cultural reasons. Total and aroma-active volatiles from both flavoring materials were compared using gas chromatography-olfactory (GC-O) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The volatiles from Thummong leaves and the Mangdana water beetle were collected and concentrated using headspace solid-phase microextraction. A total of 23 and 25 aroma-active volatiles were identified in Thummong leaves and Mangdana, respectively. The major aroma-active volatiles in Thummong leaves consisted of 7 aldehydes, 5 ketones, and 3 esters. In contrast, the aroma-active volatiles in the water beetle consisted of 11 aldehydes, 3 esters, and 2 ketones. Both had (E)-2-nonenal as the most intense aroma-active volatile. The water beetle character impact volatile (E)-2-hexenyl acetate was absent in the leaves, but its aroma character was mimicked by 11-dodecen-2-one in the leaves, which was absent in the beetle. In addition, a commercial Mangdana flavoring was examined using GC-O and GC-MS and found to contain only a single aroma-active volatile, hexyl acetate. All three flavoring sources exhibited similar aroma characteristics but were produced from profoundly different aroma-active volatiles.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. Vol.66, No.10 (2018), 2480-2484en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01499en_US
dc.identifier.issn15205118en_US
dc.identifier.issn00218561en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85043761892en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/44796
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85043761892&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectChemistryen_US
dc.titleComparison of Aroma Character Impact Volatiles of Thummong Leaves (Litsea petiolata Hook. f.), Mangdana Water Beetle (Lethocerus indicus), and a Commercial Product as Flavoring Agents in Thai Traditional Cookingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85043761892&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections