Publication:
The role of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition in the postoperative outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis patients

dc.contributor.authorThanase Ariyawatkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorWitchate Pichaisaken_US
dc.contributor.authorCholavech Chavasirien_US
dc.contributor.authorVisit Vamvanijen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirichai Wilartratsamien_US
dc.contributor.authorPanya Luksanapruksaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T10:15:39Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T10:15:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery. Study Design: Retrospective study. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the association of surgical intervention with clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with spinal calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition (SCPPD) versus that in those who underwent the surgery for LSS without SCPPD. OverView of Literature: Calcium pyrophosphate (CPP)-associated arthritis is one of the most common types of arthritis. The clinical outcomes are well studied in CPP-associated arthritis of the appendicular joints. However, few studies have investigated SCPPD. Methods: A single-institution database was reviewed. LSS patients were categorized as those who did and did not have SCPPD, based on histologic identification. Clinical presentations and postoperative results were analyzed. Disability and QoL were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, with 18 patients being allocated to the SCPPD group and 16 being allocated to the non-SCPPD group. Preoperative and postoperative pain scores were not significantly different between the groups (p=0.33 and p=0.48, respectively). The average preoperative ODI score in the SCPPD group was slightly higher than that in the non-SCPPD group (57 vs. 51, p=0.33); however, the postoperative ODI score was significantly lower (15 vs. 43, p=0.01). The postoperative physical function, vitality, and mental health of the SCPPD patients were also significantly improved (p=0.03, p=0.022, andp=0.022, respectively). Conclusions: Surgical intervention resulted in good clinical outcomes in SCPPD patients. As per our findings, total removal of CPP-involved tissue is unnecessary. As such, surgery should be performed as indicated according to clinical presentation without considering the presence of CPPD.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Spine Journal. Vol.13, No.6 (2019), 1001-1009en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.31616/asj.2018.0280en_US
dc.identifier.issn19767846en_US
dc.identifier.issn19761902en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85077577001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51995
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077577001&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe role of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition in the postoperative outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077577001&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections