Publication:
Real-world experience of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) usage in Thailand: a single-center, retrospective analysis

dc.contributor.authorWipharak Rattanavipanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorThanyaluck Sotananusaken_US
dc.contributor.authorFairus Yamaaeen_US
dc.contributor.authorArisa Chandrsawangen_US
dc.contributor.authorPitchapa Kaewkanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSurakit Nathisuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTeerapat Yingchoncharoenen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:03:24Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:03:24Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has been revolutionized by angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI). ARNI has been shown to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in a large, randomized controlled trial. However, real-world evaluation of ARNI with a diverse population is still limited. Methods: HFrEF patients receiving angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) or standard HF treatment at a university hospital in Thailand were prospectively followed-up from January 2015 to December 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups. Results: During a follow-up period of 12 months, the primary outcome occurred in 10 patients in the ARNI group (11.5%) and 28 in the standard treatment group (28.0%) (hazard ratio 0.34; 95% CI: 0.15–0.80; p = 0.013). After adjustment for confounding factors, ARNI was significantly associated with a significant reduction in the primary outcome (HR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13–0.82, p = 0.017). In addition, ARNI was also significantly associated with a decrease in the clinical signs and symptoms of HF, including dyspnea, orthopnea, and fatigue. Orthostatic hypotension was more frequently reported among the ARNI group than among the standard treatment group. The rates of target dose achievement were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: In real-world practice, ARNI use was associated with a significant reduction in both clinical outcomes and symptom improvement, while orthostatic hypotension was more common in patients in the ARNI group than in patients in the standard treatment group.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Cardiovascular Disorders. Vol.21, No.1 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12872-021-02145-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712261en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85109179940en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77562
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109179940&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleReal-world experience of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) usage in Thailand: a single-center, retrospective analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109179940&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections