Publication: Stimulus intensity determined by dose-titration versus age-based methods in electroconvulsive therapy in Thai patients
| dc.contributor.author | Pichai Ittasakul | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Apichaya Likitnukul | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Umporn Pitidhrammabhorn | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Punjaporn Waleeprakhon | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Morris B. Goldman | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University | en_US |
| dc.contributor.other | Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-27T10:36:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-01-27T10:36:02Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-01-01 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | © 2019 Ittasakul et al. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the stimulus intensity (SI) calculated by age-based methods with that using the dose-titration method. Methods: The initial seizure threshold (IST) was determined using a standardized dose titration in hospitalized Thai patients treated with right unilateral (RUL, n=32) and bilateral (BL, n=57) electrode placement. The correlation between the IST and clinical variables was analyzed. The estimated SI based on the patient’s age was compared with the SI determined by dose titration. Results: Age was highly predictive of the IST for both groups (RUL, P=0.012; BL, P=0.045). Gender (P=0.006) and anticholinergic drug use (P=0.025) predicted the IST for the BL group. For the RUL group, the mean±SD (median) SI estimated using the half-age and age methods was 158±46 (169) mC and 315±92 (338) mC, respectively. The SI determined using the dose-titration method was higher compared with the half-age method and lower compared with the age method. For the RUL group, 31% of subjects using the half-age method and 22% of subjects using the age method would have received an SI within ±20% of that computed using dose titration. Additionally, 19% of subjects using the half-age method and 19% using the age method would have received unacceptably low (<50%) or high (>200%) intensities. For the BL group, 18% of subjects using the half-age method and 32% using the age method would have received an SI within ±20% of that computed using dose titration. Additionally, 39% with the half-age method and 18% with the age method would have received an unacceptably low or high SI, respectively. Conclusion: Age strongly predicts the IST, but it does not robustly predict the SI compared with dose titration because the SI calculated using age-based methods results in an unacceptably low or high SI that is associated with a marked risk of adverse effects or inadequate response. We recommend the dose-titration method to determine the SI. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. Vol.15, (2019), 429-434 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2147/NDT.S187589 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 11782021 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 11766328 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85062662561 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52331 | |
| dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
| dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
| dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85062662561&origin=inward | en_US |
| dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
| dc.title | Stimulus intensity determined by dose-titration versus age-based methods in electroconvulsive therapy in Thai patients | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85062662561&origin=inward | en_US |
