Publication: Factors influencing venous pain in patients with cancer receiving gemcitabine
Issued Date
2018-06-01
Resource Type
ISSN
01252208
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85064209062
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.101, No.6 (2018), S151-S155
Suggested Citation
Rasarudee Sriwisai, Jutamas Munpichai, Kanjana Sajai, Naritorn Intarabut, Thanutchaporn Prangjan, Pattarawan Udta, Nahathai Phanyasuk, Benjamas Preechakoon, Dararat Chuwongin, Phongthara Vichitvejpaisal Factors influencing venous pain in patients with cancer receiving gemcitabine. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.101, No.6 (2018), S151-S155. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46615
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Factors influencing venous pain in patients with cancer receiving gemcitabine
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2018, Medical Association of Thailand. All rights reserved. Background: Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy drug used to treat several cancers. Nevertheless, pain is an adverse effect during drug administration. Objective: To study the contributing factors relating to venous discomfort during Gemcitabine administration. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study to investigate the factors including gender, age, drug, formula, dosage, time, type and volume of solution, duration, and site of administration have been retrospectively evaluated in cancer patients receiving Gemcitabine. As the occurrence of venous pain is approximately 37% of the time and each variable requires 10 times of drug administration to prove for pain distress, the calculated sample size was 372 from 72 patients. The pain discomfort was recorded by using numeric rating scale. Ap of less than 0.05 was considered statistical significance. Results: Patients receiving Gemcitabine intravenously suffered with pain at 5.1% of the time relating to the site of venipuncture at Basilic vein (p<0.005), at the fourth to the ninth cycle ofdrug administration (p<0.003), female patients (p<0.024), and patients younger than 65 years (p<0.032) in a successive order. Nevertheless, there were no correlations to other factors. Discussion: The Basilic vein was a less-aching site, since it is a large superficial vein. Patients at the fourth to the ninth cycle ofdrug administration experienced this distress dramatically, possibly because of the drug(s) accumulating and affecting the venous framework. Female, younger than 65 years underwent this concern more than the younger. This might due to the elder member having accumulated experience of pain through their life. Conclusion: Venous pain among subjects receiving Gemcitabine is an adverse effect during administration. However, nurses can reduce venous pain by selecting Basilic vein to administer Gemcitabine.