Publication: Multisectoral governance for health: Challenges in implementing a total ban on chrysotile asbestos in Thailand
Issued Date
2018-10-01
Resource Type
ISSN
20597908
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85061807651
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
BMJ Global Health. Vol.3, (2018)
Suggested Citation
Churnrurtai Kanchanachitra, Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Walaiporn Patcharanarumol, Tipicha Posayanonda Multisectoral governance for health: Challenges in implementing a total ban on chrysotile asbestos in Thailand. BMJ Global Health. Vol.3, (2018). doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000383 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/46278
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Multisectoral governance for health: Challenges in implementing a total ban on chrysotile asbestos in Thailand
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2018 BMJ Global Health. All Rights Reserved. Introduction Interest in multisectoral governance for health has grown in recent years in response to the limitations of government-centric policy formulation and implementation. This study describes multisectoral governance associated with policy formulation and implementation of a total ban on chrysotile asbestos in Thailand. Methods Qualitative methods were applied, including analysis of related literature and media, and in-depth interviews with key informants. Consent was obtained for interview and tape recording; protection of confidentiality was fully assured. Results An agenda on total ban of chrysotile asbestos was proposed to the National Health Assembly, where a resolution was adopted in 2010. The resolution was endorsed by the Cabinet in 2011, which mandated the Ministry of Industry to implement the ban immediately. There was uneven interest and ownership by stakeholders in the policy formulation process. Long delays in implementation have been observed. Furthermore, while the policy is likely to affect relatively few industries there has been misinformation on the safe use of chrysotile, and delaying tactics and pressure from major chrysotileexporting countries. Conclusion The National Health Assembly is a useful platform for policy formulation on complex policy issues requiring multisectoral action. However, policy implementation is challenging due to lack of clear policy across sectors. Success in protecting people's health requires participatory policy-making and effective governance of multisectoral action throughout implementation. The Assembly is not designed to enforce implementation, especially when power and authority lie with state actors, but monitoring and public reporting would be powerful tools to drive this agenda.