Publication:
Community-based antibiotic access and use in six low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-method approach

dc.contributor.authorNga T.T. Doen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuong T.L. Vuen_US
dc.contributor.authorChuc T.K. Nguyenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSureeporn Punpuingen_US
dc.contributor.authorWasif Ali Khanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMargaret Gyapongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKwaku Poku Asanteen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhatia Munguambeen_US
dc.contributor.authorF. Xavier Gómez-Olivéen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohannes John-Langbaen_US
dc.contributor.authorToan K. Tranen_US
dc.contributor.authorMalee Sunpuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorEsperanca Seveneen_US
dc.contributor.authorHanh H. Nguyenen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhuc D. Hoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMohammad Abdul Matinen_US
dc.contributor.authorSabeena Ahmeden_US
dc.contributor.authorMohammad Mahbubul Karimen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlga Cambacoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSamuel Afari-Asieduen_US
dc.contributor.authorEllen Boamah-Kaalien_US
dc.contributor.authorMartha Ali Abdulaien_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Williamsen_US
dc.contributor.authorSabina Asiamahen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorgina Amankwahen_US
dc.contributor.authorMary Pomaa Agyekumen_US
dc.contributor.authorFezile Wagneren_US
dc.contributor.authorProochista Arianaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBetuel Sigauqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorStephen Tollmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorH. Rogier van Doornen_US
dc.contributor.authorOsman Sankohen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Kinsmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorHeiman F.L. Wertheimen_US
dc.contributor.otherOxford University Clinical Research Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ghanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherNjala Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversidade Eduardo Mondlaneen_US
dc.contributor.otherKintampo Health Research Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherHanoi Institute of Mathematicsen_US
dc.contributor.otherHanoi Medical Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUmeå Universiteten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversität Heidelbergen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburgen_US
dc.contributor.otherWits School of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of KwaZulu-Natalen_US
dc.contributor.otherInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladeshen_US
dc.contributor.otherRadboud University Medical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherStatistics Sierra Leoneen_US
dc.contributor.otherManhiça Health Research Center (CISM)en_US
dc.contributor.otherDodowa Health Research Centreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:25:42Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:25:42Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Antimicrobial misuse is common in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), and this practice is a driver of antibiotic resistance. We compared community-based antibiotic access and use practices across communities in LMICs to identify contextually specific targets for interventions to improve antibiotic use practices. Methods: We did quantitative and qualitative assessments of antibiotic access and use in six LMICs across Africa (Mozambique, Ghana, and South Africa) and Asia (Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Thailand) over a 2·5-year study period (July 1, 2016–Dec 31, 2018). We did quantitative assessments of community antibiotic access and use through supplier mapping, customer exit interviews, and household surveys. These quantitative assessments were triangulated with qualitative drug supplier and consumer interviews and discussions. Findings: Vietnam and Bangladesh had the largest proportions of non-licensed antibiotic dispensing points. For mild illness, drug stores were the most common point of contact when seeking antibiotics in most countries, except South Africa and Mozambique, where public facilities were most common. Self-medication with antibiotics was found to be widespread in Vietnam (55·2% of antibiotics dispensed without prescription), Bangladesh (45·7%), and Ghana (36·1%), but less so in Mozambique (8·0%), South Africa (1·2%), and Thailand (3·9%). Self-medication was considered to be less time consuming, cheaper, and overall, more convenient than accessing them through health-care facilities. Factors determining where treatment was sought often involved relevant policies, trust in the supplier and the drug, disease severity, and whether the antibiotic was intended for a child. Confusion regarding how to identify oral antibiotics was revealed in both Africa and Asia. Interpretation: Contextual complexities and differences between countries with different incomes, policy frameworks, and cultural norms were revealed. These contextual differences render a single strategy inadequate and instead necessitate context-tailored, integrated intervention packages to improve antibiotic use in LMICs as part of global efforts to combat antibiotic resistance. Funding: Wellcome Trust and Volkswagen Foundation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Global Health. Vol.9, No.5 (2021), e610-e619en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00024-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214109Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85104108687en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78252
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104108687&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCommunity-based antibiotic access and use in six low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-method approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85104108687&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections