Publication: Clinical outcomes of double- vs single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of randomized control trials
Issued Date
2013-02-01
Resource Type
ISSN
16000838
09057188
09057188
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84872300770
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. Vol.23, No.1 (2013), 1-14
Suggested Citation
J. Kongtharvonskul, J. Attia, S. Thamakaison, C. Kijkunasathian, P. Woratanarat, A. Thakkinstian Clinical outcomes of double- vs single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of randomized control trials. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. Vol.23, No.1 (2013), 1-14. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01439.x Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/31817
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Clinical outcomes of double- vs single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of randomized control trials
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with double-bundle and single-bundle techniques are still controversial. We therefore performed a systematic review to compare postoperative outcomes between the two techniques. Randomized control trials comparing the outcomes between the two techniques were identified from Medline and EMBASE since inception to April 27, 2011. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers. Thirteen of 318 studies were eligible; 9, 11, 7, and 8 studies were pooled for rotation, translation, function, and complication outcomes, respectively. The double-bundle technique was approximately four times (95% CI: 2.65, 11.99) and two times (95% CI: 1.16, 5.21) more likely to show a normal pivot shift and normal International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grading compared with the single-bundle technique. However, there were nonsignificant differences in KT grading (OR=1.66, 95% CI: 0.77, 3.82), IKDC score (0.29, 95% CI: -1.17, 1.75), Lysholm knee score (-0.87, 95% CI: -2.66, 0.93), Tegner activity score (0.37, 95% CI: -0.05, 0.79), and complications (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.48, 2.57). Heterogeneity was present in some outcomes but there was no evidence of publication bias for any outcome. The double-bundle may be better than the single-bundle ACL reconstruction technique in rotational stability but not for function, translation, and complications. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.