Publication:
Evaluation of biomechanical properties on partial and complete epitendinous suture in human cadaver flexor tendon repair

dc.contributor.authorThepparat Kanchanathepsaken_US
dc.contributor.authorWilarat Wairojanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSorasak Suppapholen_US
dc.contributor.authorIttirat Watcharanananen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanithan Tuntiyatornen_US
dc.contributor.authorTulyapruek Tawonsawatruken_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:02:45Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:02:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study was designed to compare the ultimate tensile strength and force to 2 mm gap formation among 50% partial, 75% partial, and complete circumferential epitendinous suture with a combination of 4-strand core suture in human cadaver flexor tendon. Materials and methods: Forty-five flexor tendons from four soft human cadavers were used to evaluate the biomechanical property among 50% partial, 75% partial, and complete circumferential epitendinous suture with a combination of 4-strand core suture. Results: The force to 2 mm gap of complete epitendinous was significantly greater than partial epitendinous suture (P < 0.05); however, there was no difference between 50% partial and 75% partial epitendinous suture (P > 0.05). For the ultimate strength, there was no significant difference between partial and complete epitendinous suture (P > 0.05). The partial epitendinous was approximately 60% of the complete epitendinous suture in force to 2 mm gap and also 70% of complete epitendinous suture in ultimate tensile strength with a combination of core sutures. Conclusions: The complete epitendinous suture showed better ultimate tensile strength and force to 2 mm gap compared with a partial 50% and 75% epitendinous suture. However, in some clinical scenario which the complete epitendinous suture is not possible to perform, the authors suggested only partial epitendinous suture with 50% circumference is recommended as the additional epitendinous repair up 75% circumference cannot provide any mechanical benefit to the repaired site.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. Vol.16, No.1 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13018-021-02645-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749799Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85112441511en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77550
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112441511&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of biomechanical properties on partial and complete epitendinous suture in human cadaver flexor tendon repairen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112441511&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections