Publication:
A meta-synthesis of bibliometric reviews of research on managing for sustainability, 1982-2019

dc.contributor.authorPhilip Hallingeren_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Johannesburgen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:34:10Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:34:10Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-02en_US
dc.description.abstractThis review of research used meta-synthesis to integrate findings from seven bibliometric reviews of research on managing for sustainability in different management disciplines: leadership, human resource management, entrepreneurship management, innovation management, supply chain management, knowledge management, and strategic management. The purposes of the review were to document empirically key features of this knowledge base as well as to identify leading journals, and documents. The meta-synthesis analyzed bibliographic data associated with 9927 relevant documents sourced from the Scopus index. The review confirmed the existence of a large body of management research on sustainability. This research, which first emerged during the 1980s, has grown exponentially since 2010. Although authorship of this corpus has been concentrated in Anglo- American-European (AAE) societies (60%), the authors of this corpus represent 140 different societies. Moreover, there is a recent trend of increasing contributions from developing societies such as China, India, Malaysia, Brazil, and South Africa. There are large differences in the “between-discipline” proportion of research produced on sustainability topics, with knowledge management and supply chain management evidencing the largest and human resource management the smallest proportions of this literature. The review also provided insight into the most influential journals (e.g., Journal of Cleaner Production, Sustainability, International Journal of Production Economics, Business Strategy and the Environment) and documents in the literature on managing for sustainability. Document co-citation analysis yielded three key conceptual themes within this literature: Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Strategic Management of Resources for Sustainability, Social Entrepreneurship. This analysis further highlighted the central role that strategic management theories have played in shaping sustainability discourse across the different management disciplines.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSustainability (Switzerland). Vol.13, No.6 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su13063469en_US
dc.identifier.issn20711050en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85103113264en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76912
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103113264&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleA meta-synthesis of bibliometric reviews of research on managing for sustainability, 1982-2019en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103113264&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections