Publication:
Effect of Cold Shower on Recovery From High-Intensity Cycling in the Heat

dc.contributor.authorAmornpan Ajjimapornen_US
dc.contributor.authorRungchai Chaunchaiyakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirikun Pitsamaien_US
dc.contributor.authorWaree Widjajaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherInstitute of Physical Education Phetchabunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T08:49:35Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T08:49:35Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAjjimaporn, A, Chaunchaiyakul, R, Pitsamai, S, and Widjaja, W. Effect of cold shower on recovery from high-intensity cycling in the heat. J Strength Cond Res 33(8): 2233-2240, 2019-Post-exercise cooling, e.g., cold water immersion has shown beneficial cardiovascular and hormonal effects during recovery from exercise in a hot environment. However, not much is known about the effects of a cold water shower (CWS) as a recovery intervention. This study examined the effects of a CWS on heart rate (HR), core temperature (Tc), salivary cortisol, and thermal comfort sensation (TCS) after exercise in the heat. Nine healthy male subjects (age, 21 ± 1 year) performed 45 minutes of cycling in a hot environment (35° C, 40-60% relative humidity) at 65% of peak oxygen uptake. Thereafter, subjects underwent the CWS condition (15 minutes, 15° C water shower) or control (SIT25; 15 minutes passive recovery in 25° C room) in a randomized crossover design. After each 15 minutes, subjects sat in a 25° C room for another 2-hour recovery. Heart rate, Tc, and TCS were recorded before and immediately after exercise, immediately after CWS or SIT25, and at 30 minutes, 1, and 2 hours during additional recovery. Salivary cortisol was collected at the same time points except at 30 minutes of the additional recovery period. Thermal comfort sensation was higher immediately after CWS (+4; very comfortable) than SIT25 (+1; just comfortable). The change of HR decreased faster with CWS (-18.3 ± 2.3%) than with SIT25 (-7.0 ± 4.6%) at the first 30-minute recovery time point (p < 0.01). No differences between recovery conditions were observed for the Tc or salivary cortisol at any time point during the 2-hour recovery period. The findings demonstrate that a 15-minute, 15° C CWS was not effective in reducing Tc or salivary cortisol during recovery from exercise in a hot environment. However, CWS can promote TCS by facilitating a faster HR recovery after 30-minute postintervention compared with passive recovery. The cooling benefits of a CWS could be only recommended to reduce cardiac stress after routine workout in a hot environment.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of strength and conditioning research. Vol.33, No.8 (2019), 2233-2240en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000003017en_US
dc.identifier.issn15334287en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85070516751en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/50953
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070516751&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectHealth Professionsen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffect of Cold Shower on Recovery From High-Intensity Cycling in the Heaten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070516751&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections