Publication:
Spatial distribution of pm<inf>10</inf> and PM<inf>2.5</inf> in Ambient Air at E-waste Dismantling Community in Buriram, Thailand

dc.contributor.authorSiriwipha Chanthahongen_US
dc.contributor.authorTassanee Prueksasiten_US
dc.contributor.authorNarut Sahanavinen_US
dc.contributor.authorNavaporn Kanjanasiranonten_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherCenter of Excellence on Hazardous Substance Management (HSM)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T09:39:18Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T09:39:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. The spatial distribution of PM10 and PM2.5 was observed at the e-waste dismantling community in Daengyai and Banpao subdistrict, Buriram, Thailand. High and low volume air samplers were used to collect PM10 and PM2.5 in the ambient air, respectively, at e-waste dismantling, non-e-waste dismantling, open dumpsite, and reference area. The sampling was performed during summer and rainy seasons of 2019 for 24 h and seven consecutive days. The average concentrations of PM10 were 49.64 ± 17.71, 55.36 ± 17.46 and 57.61 ± 17.55 µg/m3 at e-waste dismantling, non-e-waste dismantling, and open dump area, respectively. For PM2.5, the average concentrations at e-waste dismantling, non-e-waste dismantling, and open dump area were 29.71 ± 14.28, 33.81 ± 18.85, 30.68 ± 13.53 µg/m3, respectively. PM10 levels at open dumpsite were 1.2 and 1.1 times higher than those of e-waste dismantling area and non-e-waste dismantling area. Meanwhile, ANOVA analysis showed no significant differences (p &gt; 0.05) of PM10 concentration between non- and e-waste dismantling, and open dumpsite. The level of PM2.5 at the e-waste dismantling area was only higher than the reference area but lower than non-e-waste dismantling and open dump area. Besides, there was no statistically significant difference between all sampling sites for PM2.5 concentration. PM10 at non-e-waste dismantling area and open dumpsite were exceeded guidelines of WHO (50 µg/m3), and also PM2.5 (25 µg/m3) of all sampling areas. In this e-waste community, there is no zoning provided for e-waste dismantling activities. Consequently, e-waste dismantling houses were randomly distributed in the community. Consequently, it can be indicated that e-waste dismantling activities led to more PM10 contribution than PM2.5.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Engineering. (2020), 371-379en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-45263-6_33en_US
dc.identifier.issn18635539en_US
dc.identifier.issn18635520en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85087004495en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/57836
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087004495&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleSpatial distribution of pm<inf>10</inf> and PM<inf>2.5</inf> in Ambient Air at E-waste Dismantling Community in Buriram, Thailanden_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087004495&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections