Publication: Comparison of computerized and standard cognitive test in Thai memory clinic
dc.contributor.author | Pornpatr A. Dharmasaroja | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Disya Ratanakorn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Samart Nidhinandana | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thammanard Charernboon | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Phramongkutklao College of Medicine | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-28T06:38:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-28T06:38:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018 Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow. Background: Computer-based Thai Cognitive Test or Computer-based Thai Mental State Examination (cTMSE) was developed aiming to help doctors to easily get the accurate results of TMSE in a routine, busy outpatient clinics. The purpose of this study was to compare the evaluation process in terms of feasibility, duration of the test, participants/administrator preference, and the results of cognitive test between cTMSE and the standard Thai Mental State Examination (sTMSE). Methods: Twenty-two elderly participants (>60 years old) who were not demented and 22 patients with mild-to-moderate dementia were included in the study. All participants would be asked to have TMSE by standard method (sTMSE) and computer-based method (cTMSE), at least 2 weeks and up to 2 months apart. Scores and duration of the test were compared using dependent paired t-test. Agreement of the tests between two methods and Kappa statistics were analyzed. Results: Paired t-test showed no significant difference in scores between the two methods (mean sTMSE vs. cTMSE: 22.84 vs. 22.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-0.465] to 0.987, P = 0.524). Percent of agreement between the two methods was 92.5%, with the Kappa of 0.85 (P < 0.001). Duration of the test by sTMSE was slightly shorter than the cTMSE (7.31 min vs. 7.97 min, 95% CI: [-1.159] to [-0.175], P = 0.09). Overall, participants liked being tested by cTMSE more than sTMSE. Conclusion: Computer-based TMSE was feasible to use and accurate for screening in aging adults and for cognitive evaluation in patients with mild-to-moderate dementia. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. Vol.9, No.1 (2018), 140-142 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_373_17 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 09763155 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 09763147 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85041106063 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/47211 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041106063&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject | Neuroscience | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of computerized and standard cognitive test in Thai memory clinic | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041106063&origin=inward | en_US |