Publication:
Response to comment on “plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale”

dc.contributor.authorJoseph A. LaMannaen_US
dc.contributor.authorScott A. Manganen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlfonso Alonsoen_US
dc.contributor.authorNorman A. Bourgen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarren Y. Brockelmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSarayudh Bunyavejchewinen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi Wan Changen_US
dc.contributor.authorJyh Min Chiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorge B. Chuyongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKeith Clayen_US
dc.contributor.authorSusan Cordellen_US
dc.contributor.authorStuart J. Daviesen_US
dc.contributor.authorTucker J. Furnissen_US
dc.contributor.authorChristian P. Giardinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorI. A.U. Nimal Gunatillekeen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. V. Savitri Gunatillekeen_US
dc.contributor.authorFangliang Heen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert W. Hoween_US
dc.contributor.authorStephen P. Hubbellen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang Fu Hsiehen_US
dc.contributor.authorFaith M. Inman-Naraharien_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid Janíken_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniel J. Johnsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid Kenfacken_US
dc.contributor.authorLisa Korteen_US
dc.contributor.authorKamil Králen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrew J. Larsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames A. Lutzen_US
dc.contributor.authorSean M. McMahonen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliam J. McSheaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHervé R. Memiagheen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnuttara Nathalangen_US
dc.contributor.authorVojtech Novotnyen_US
dc.contributor.authorPerry S. Ongen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid A. Orwigen_US
dc.contributor.authorRebecca Ostertagen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeoffrey G. Parkeren_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard P. Phillipsen_US
dc.contributor.authorLawren Sacken_US
dc.contributor.authorI. Fang Sunen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Sebastián Telloen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuncan W. Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorBenjamin L. Turneren_US
dc.contributor.authorDilys M. Vela Díazen_US
dc.contributor.authorTomáš Vrškaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorge D. Weiblenen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmy Wolfen_US
dc.contributor.authorSandra Yapen_US
dc.contributor.authorJonathan A. Myersen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department, Thailanden_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of the Philippines Dilimanen_US
dc.contributor.otherFar Eastern University Manilaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Peradeniyaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Bueaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUnited States Department of Agricultureen_US
dc.contributor.otherUtah State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherAcademy of Sciences of the Czech Republicen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Albertaen_US
dc.contributor.otherSmithsonian Tropical Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Zoological Parken_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Minnesota Twin Citiesen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, Los Angelesen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Montanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherSun Yat-Sen Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherIndiana Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherTunghai Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSmithsonian Environmental Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Hawaii at Hiloen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Dong Hwa Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherUnited States Geological Surveyen_US
dc.contributor.otherWashington University in St. Louisen_US
dc.contributor.otherJihoceská Univerzita v Ceských Budejovicíchen_US
dc.contributor.otherCNRS Centre National de la Recherche Scientifiqueen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Wisconsin-Green Bayen_US
dc.contributor.otherSmithsonian National Museum of Natural Historyen_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard Foresten_US
dc.contributor.otherTaiwan Forestry Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Taiwan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherWashington State University Vancouveren_US
dc.contributor.otherMissouri Botanical Gardenen_US
dc.contributor.otherSilva Tarouca Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherNew Guinea Binatang Research Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Zoological Parken_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T07:13:07Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T07:13:07Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-25en_US
dc.description.abstract2017 © The Authors, Chisholm and Fung claim that our method of estimating conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD) in recruitment is systematically biased, and present an alternative method that shows no latitudinal pattern in CNDD. We demonstrate that their approach produces strongly biased estimates of CNDD, explaining why they do not detect a latitudinal pattern. We also address their methodological concerns using an alternative distance-weighted approach, which supports our original findings of a latitudinal gradient in CNDD and a latitudinal shift in the relationship between CNDD and species abundance.en_US
dc.identifier.citationScience. Vol.360, No.6391 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1126/science.aar5245en_US
dc.identifier.issn10959203en_US
dc.identifier.issn00368075en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85047415717en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/47519
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047415717&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.titleResponse to comment on “plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale”en_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047415717&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections