Publication: Lidocaine versus plain saline for pain relief in fractional curettage: A randomized controlled trial
Issued Date
2001-10-09
Resource Type
ISSN
00297844
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-0034813178
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Obstetrics and Gynecology. Vol.98, No.4 (2001), 592-595
Suggested Citation
Boonsri Chanrachakul, Puchong Likittanasombut, Pratak O-Prasertsawat, Yongyoth Herabutya Lidocaine versus plain saline for pain relief in fractional curettage: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Vol.98, No.4 (2001), 592-595. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01529-0 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/26687
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Lidocaine versus plain saline for pain relief in fractional curettage: A randomized controlled trial
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficiency of lidocaine with that of plain saline for paracervical pain relief during fractional curettage. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, controlled trial included 140 women who underwent fractional curettage. Seventy women were allocated to the lidocaine group and 70 to the plain saline group. The main outcome measure was the intensity of pain measured by visual analog scale during and after the procedure. RESULTS: The intensity of pain was significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the plain saline group over the course of the procedure (P=.02), especially during fractional curettage. There were no serious adverse effects in this study. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine is more effective than plain saline for paracervical pain relief during fractional curettage. The anesthetic mechanisms of lidocaine are mechanical distention of tissue and peripheral nerve block. © 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.