Publication:
Does silent giardia infection need any attention?

dc.contributor.authorSupaluk Popruken_US
dc.contributor.authorKanthinich Thimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuenruetai Udonsomen_US
dc.contributor.authorPongruj Rattapraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorYaowalark Sukthanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T08:14:15Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T08:14:15Z
dc.date.issued2011-11-09en_US
dc.description.abstractEven though treatment of symptomatic cases as well as improving hygiene and sanitation conditions decrease giardiasis in underdeveloped and/or developing countries, Giardia duodenalis infection is still frequently encountered especially in children living in crowded conditions leading to public health problems. We studied the prevalence of G. duodenalis infection in 274 asymptomatic Thai boy orphans, living in/around the Bangkok metropolitan area, by use of direct fecal smear and formalin-ethyl acetate techniques. This was done to explore our hypothesis that children with asymptomatic giardiasis, who are not likely to be treated, have a high potential for spreading this pathogen. Positive Giardia cases were further genotyped by 2 genes: small subunit ribosomal RNA (ssrRNA) and glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) to determine the distribution of each G. duodenalis assemblage. Positive G. duodenalis infection was 11.67 % and revealed at 10.63%, 12% and 15%, in PK, TMK, and MHK orphanages, respectively. The overall parasitic infection, including Giardia, was 48.54% consisting mostly of non-pathogenic organisms i.e. Blastocystis hominis, Entamoeba coli, Endolimax nana, Entamoeba histolytica-like, Chilomastix mesnili, Trichuris trichiura, Hymenolepis nana, Strongyloides stercoralis and Hookworm. Fourteen (70 %) and 4 (20 %) out of the 20 positive Giardia samples could be amplified by ssrRNA and gdh genes, respectively; three belonged to the sub-assemblage BIV and only one indicated sub-assemblage AII. Thus children infected with sub-assemblage BIV isolate are more common in this study. In conclusion, we focused on asymptomatic giardiasis children, hitherto unrecognized, who consistently contaminate their environments with cysts. We favor not only treating these children to eradicate the source of the infection, but also to encourage an active surveillance program consisting of highly sensitive methods to identify silent giardiasis cases. In addition to these 2 strategies, a continuous fruitful health education program for all stakeholders is another crucial tool. These actions will benefit the control of human giardiasis and reduce public health problems. © Popruk et al.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOpen Tropical Medicine Journal. Vol.4, No.1 (2011), 26-32en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/1874315301104010026en_US
dc.identifier.issn18743153en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-80455157964en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/11966
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80455157964&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDoes silent giardia infection need any attention?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80455157964&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections