Publication:
Comparison of DNA, aminoethylglycyl PNA and pyrrolidinyl PNA as probes for detection of DNA hybridization using surface plasmon resonance technique

dc.contributor.authorCheeraporn Ananthanawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorTirayut Vilaivanen_US
dc.contributor.authorVoravee P. Hovenen_US
dc.contributor.authorXiaodi Suen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering, A-Star, Singaporeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T08:48:29Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T08:48:29Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-15en_US
dc.description.abstractPyrrolidinyl peptide nucleic acid bearing a d-prolyl-2-aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acid backbone (acpcPNA) has been evaluated as a new sensing probe for detection of DNA hybridization. In this study, the biotinylated acpcPNA was immobilized on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor chips via biotin-streptavidin interactions for solid-phase DNA hybridization. A critical comparison between acpcPNA, DNA and conventional peptide nucleic acid (aegPNA) probes of the same sequence was made by means of SPR on various important aspects. These include the effect of ionic strength on hybridization efficiency, the specificity to detect the mismatch(es) in target DNAs, the direction of binding (parallel or antiparallel) to target DNAs, and the effect of target DNA concentration on hybridization efficiency. Results indicated that the immobilized acpcPNA probe possesses distinct hybridization properties relative to aegPNA (and/or DNA) counterparts, including a higher single-base mismatch sensitivity, antiparallel selectivity and low ionic strength dependence of target hybridization. These properties substantiate the acpcPNA applicability as sensor probes for clinical and diagnostic applications. With a proper selection of regeneration conditions (10 mM NaOH, 2 min exposure), the sensor can be reused for multiple cycles of hybridization with as little as 1.3% loss in hybridization activity per regeneration cycle. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBiosensors and Bioelectronics. Vol.25, No.5 (2010), 1064-1069en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bios.2009.09.028en_US
dc.identifier.issn09565663en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-71849105931en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/28804
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=71849105931&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectChemistryen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.titleComparison of DNA, aminoethylglycyl PNA and pyrrolidinyl PNA as probes for detection of DNA hybridization using surface plasmon resonance techniqueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=71849105931&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections