Publication:
The efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccination among Thai elderly persons living in the community

dc.contributor.authorRungnirand Praditsuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrasert Assantachaien_US
dc.contributor.authorChantapong Wasien_US
dc.contributor.authorPilaipan Puthavatanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorUraiwan Kositanonten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T08:30:31Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T08:30:31Z
dc.date.issued2005-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination in the Thai elderly living in an urban community. Material and Method: The study design was a stratified, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 635 participants aged 60 years and older living in an urban community was randomized to receive an influenza vaccine or tetanus toxoidas a placebo injection. All participants were followed up 4-6 weeks in the community for influenza-like illness and treatment received, hospitalization and death for one year. A hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test for influenza virus antibody of all participants was done on the day of vaccination as well as 1 month, 5 months, and 12 months after the vaccination. Main outcome measures were immune response rate and protective titer, influenza-like illness, serological influenza, treatment received for influenza-like illness and their expenses, hospitalization and death during the study period. Results: The immune response rate of vaccinations was 97.1% and protective titer for A (H1N1) and A (H3N2) strains were 96.4 and 98.6%, respectively. The incidence of influenza-like illness was 4.83% in the vaccine group compared with 10.88% in the placebo group. The relative risk reduction was 56% (95%CI = 14 to 77%). The survival analysis also showed that vaccinations significantly reduced the incidence of influenza (p = 0.009). The number needed to prevent one episode was 17 persons (95%CI = 9 to 71 persons). The adverse reactions of vaccinations were mild and tolerable. However, the number of treatments received for influenza-like illness and their cost were not significantly different between the two groups. None of the subjects had pneumonia nor needed hospitalization during the study period. Seven participants died during the year of follow up, but not from influenza. Conclusion: In Thai elderly living in the community, influenza vaccination reduced the incidence of influenza-like illness by half but not the number of treatments received for influenza-like illness, their cost, and its serious complications. In the year of the study, considering the cost of vaccines and the numbers needed to prevent one episode of infection from the provider's viewpoint, it may not be cost-effective to recommend that all Thai older persons living in the community should receive influenza vaccination annually. Vaccination recommendation for the elderly should be promptly implemented in expectation of a severe epidemic in Thailand.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.88, No.2 (2005), 256-264en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-20444462373en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/17071
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=20444462373&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccination among Thai elderly persons living in the communityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=20444462373&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections