Publication:
Reported awareness of tobacco advertising and promotion in China compared to Thailand, Australia and the USA

dc.contributor.authorL. Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorH. H. Yongen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. Borlanden_US
dc.contributor.authorG. T. Fongen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. E. Thompsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorY. Jiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorY. Yangen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Sirirassameeen_US
dc.contributor.authorG. Hastingsen_US
dc.contributor.authorF. Harrisen_US
dc.contributor.otherCancer Council Victoriaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Waterlooen_US
dc.contributor.otherOntario Institute for Cancer Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherChinese Center for Disease Control and Preventionen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Stirlingen_US
dc.contributor.otherOpen Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T07:00:49Z
dc.date.available2018-09-13T07:00:49Z
dc.date.issued2009-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: China currently does not have comprehensive laws or regulations on tobacco advertising and promotion, although it ratified the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in October 2005 and promised to ban all tobacco advertising by January 2011. Much effort is needed to monitor the current situation of tobacco advertising and promotion in China. Objective: This study aims to examine levels of awareness of tobacco advertising and promotion among smokers in China as compared to other countries with different levels of restrictions. Methods: One developing country (Thailand) and two developed countries (Australia and the USA) were selected for comparison. All four countries are part of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Survey project. Between 2005 and 2006, parallel ITC surveys were conducted among adult smokers (at least smoked weekly) in China (n=4763), Thailand (n=2000), Australia (n=1767) and the USA (n=1780). Unprompted and prompted recall of noticing tobacco advertising and promotion were measured. Results: Chinese respondents reported noticing tobacco advertisements in a range of channels and venues, with highest exposure levels on television (34.5%), billboards (33.4%) and in stores (29.2%). A quarter of respondents noticed tobacco sponsorships, and a high level of awareness of promotion was reported. Cross-country comparison reveals that overall reported awareness was significantly higher in China than in Thailand (particularly) and Australia, but lower than in the USA. Conclusions: There is a big gap between China and the better-performing countries such as Thailand and Australia regarding tobacco promotion restrictions. China needs to do more, including enhanced policy and more robust enforcement.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTobacco Control. Vol.18, No.3 (2009), 222-227en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/tc.2008.027037en_US
dc.identifier.issn14683318en_US
dc.identifier.issn09644563en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-67649800653en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/28074
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67649800653&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleReported awareness of tobacco advertising and promotion in China compared to Thailand, Australia and the USAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67649800653&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections