Publication:
The Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission on antimicrobial resistance: 6 years later

dc.contributor.authorRamanan Laxminarayanen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas Van Boeckelen_US
dc.contributor.authorIsabel Frosten_US
dc.contributor.authorSamuel Kariukien_US
dc.contributor.authorEjaz Ahmed Khanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDirek Limmathurotsakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. G.Joakim Larssonen_US
dc.contributor.authorGabriel Levy-Haraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarc Mendelsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKevin Outtersonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSharon J. Peacocken_US
dc.contributor.authorYong Guan Zhuen_US
dc.contributor.otherKenya Medical Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherShifa International Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Cambridgeen_US
dc.contributor.otherETH Zürichen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital General de Agudos Carlos G. Duranden_US
dc.contributor.otherBoston Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherGöteborgs Universiteten_US
dc.contributor.otherImperial College Londonen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences Chinese Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherGroote Schuur Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrinceton Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherCenter for Disease Dynamicsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T05:37:32Z
dc.date.available2020-05-05T05:37:32Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Elsevier Ltd In 2013, a Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission described the state of antimicrobial resistance worldwide. Since then, greater awareness of the public health ramifications of antimicrobial resistance has led to national actions and global initiatives, including a resolution at the high-level meeting of the UN General Assembly in 2016. Progress in addressing this issue has ranged from a ban on irrational drug combinations in India to commitments to ban colistin as a growth promoter in animals, improve hospital infection control, and implement better antimicrobial stewardship. Funds have been mobilised, and regulatory barriers to new antibiotic development have been relaxed. These efforts have been episodic and uneven across countries, however. Sustained funding for antimicrobial resistance and globally harmonised targets to monitor progress are still urgently needed. Except for in a few leading countries, antimicrobial resistance has not captured the sustained focus of national leaders and country-level actors, including care providers.en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Infectious Diseases. Vol.20, No.4 (2020), e51-e60en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30003-7en_US
dc.identifier.issn14744457en_US
dc.identifier.issn14733099en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85082182997en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/54612
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082182997&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission on antimicrobial resistance: 6 years lateren_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082182997&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections