Publication:
Treatment of vivax malaria on the western border of Thailand

dc.contributor.authorChristine Luxemburgeren_US
dc.contributor.authorMichèle Van Vugten_US
dc.contributor.authorSaw Jonathanen_US
dc.contributor.authorRose McGreadyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSornchai Looareesuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas J. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrançois Nostenen_US
dc.contributor.otherShoklo Malaria Research Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherJohn Radcliffe Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherCho Quan Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T08:52:16Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T08:52:16Z
dc.date.issued1999-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy of chloroquine (25 mg base/kg over 3 days) in Plasmodium vivax malaria was evaluated in 1995/96 in 342 patients living in an endemic area on the western border of Thailand. Clearance of fever and parasites was obtained within 2 days in > 95% of the patients, and all were aparasitaemic by day 4. Reappearance of P. vivax occurred in 1 patient on day 21 and in 8 by day 28, giving a 28-day cure rate of 97% [95% confidence interval (CI) 95-99%]. By day 63, the relapse/re-infection rate was 63% (95% CI 57-69%). Most reappearances of parasitaemia (85%; 121/143) were symptomatic. These patients were retreated either with chloroquine alone (n = 70) or with chloroquine and primaquine (0.25 mg/kg daily for 14 days) (n = 43). Only 1 patient (in the chloroquine-only group) had prolonged parasite clearance (D8) and he developed recurrent P. vivax by day 21 suggesting possible recrudescence. The addition of primaquine to chloroquine reduced the risk of having a third vivax episode within 2 months by 96% (95% CI 83-99%). This resulted in a significantly higher haematocrit at day 42 despite a greater decrease in haematocrit during the first week of treatment with chloroquine-primaquine (P = 0.04). Chloroquine remains highly effective on the western border of Thailand and the use of strictly supervised primaquine effectively prevents relapse. The introduction of primaquine on a large scale in an endemic area still requires a long-term risk-benefit assessment which must take into account potential toxicity, low compliance and reductions in the incidence and severity of P. falciparum infections by co-existent P. vivax.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol.93, No.4 (1999), 433-438en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0035-9203(99)90149-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn00359203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0032837772en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/25480
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032837772&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleTreatment of vivax malaria on the western border of Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0032837772&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections