Publication:
Cost utility analysis of reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adolescence and young adult with severe thalassemia compared to hypertransfusion and iron chelation program

dc.contributor.authorRosarin Sruamsirien_US
dc.contributor.authorNathorn Chaiyakunapruken_US
dc.contributor.authorSamart Pakakasamaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomtawin Sirireungen_US
dc.contributor.authorNintita Sripaiboonkijen_US
dc.contributor.authorUdomsak Bunworasateen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuradej Hongengen_US
dc.contributor.otherNaresuan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Queenslanden_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Wisconsin Madisonen_US
dc.contributor.otherJeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-19T05:31:21Z
dc.date.available2018-10-19T05:31:21Z
dc.date.issued2013-02-07en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hematopoieticic stem cell transplantation is the only therapeutic option that can cure thalassemia disease. Reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RI-HSCT) has demonstrated a high cure rate with minimal complications compared to other options. Because RI-HSCT is very costly, economic justification for its value is needed. This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility of RI-HSCT compared with blood transfusions combined with iron chelating therapy (BT-ICT) for adolescent and young adult with severe thalassemia in Thailand. Methods. A Markov model was used to estimate the relevant costs and health outcomes over the patients' lifetimes using a societal perspective. All future costs and outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per annum. The efficacy of RI-HSCT was based a clinical trial including a total of 18 thalassemia patients. Utility values were derived directly from all patients using EQ-5D and SF-6D. Primary outcomes of interest were lifetime costs, quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in US ($) per QALY gained. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to investigate the effect of parameter uncertainty. Results: In base case analysis, the RI-HSCT group had a better clinical outcomes and higher lifetime costs. The incremental cost per QALY gained was US $ 3,236 per QALY. The acceptability curve showed that the probability of RI-HSCT being cost-effective was 71% at the willingness to pay of 1 time of Thai Gross domestic product per capita (GDP per capita), approximately US $ 4,210 per QALY gained. The most sensitive parameter was utility of severe thalassemia patients without cardiac complication patients. Conclusion: At a societal willingness to pay of 1 GDP per capita, RI-HSCT was a cost-effective treatment for adolescent and young adult with severe thalassemia in Thailand compared to BT-ICT. © 2013 Sruamsiri et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. Vol.13, No.1 (2013)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6963-13-45en_US
dc.identifier.issn14726963en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84873245612en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/32483
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84873245612&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCost utility analysis of reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adolescence and young adult with severe thalassemia compared to hypertransfusion and iron chelation programen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84873245612&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections