Publication: Estimating Human Exposure to Rat Lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) on Hawai'i Island: A Pilot Study
Issued Date
2020-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14761645
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85077761907
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. Vol.102, No.1 (2020), 69-77
Suggested Citation
Susan I. Jarvi, Praphathip Eamsobhana, Stefano Quarta, Kathleen Howe, Steven Jacquier, Alexandra Hanlon, Kirsten Snook, Robert McHugh, Zachariah Tman, Jill Miyamura, Kuilei Kramer, McKayla Meyer Estimating Human Exposure to Rat Lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) on Hawai'i Island: A Pilot Study. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. Vol.102, No.1 (2020), 69-77. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.18-0242 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/49625
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Estimating Human Exposure to Rat Lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) on Hawai'i Island: A Pilot Study
Abstract
Angiostrongylus cantonensis is a zoonotic, parasitic nematode causing angiostrongyliasis or rat lungworm disease. Clinical diagnosis in humans is currently confirmed by detection of parasite DNA in cerebrospinal fluid. This study estimated human exposure to A. cantonensis in volunteer participants solicitated via public venues on east Hawai'i Island using blood-based tests. Antibodies were screened in sera by crude antigen ELISA, followed by a 31-kDa dot-blot test developed and validated in Thailand. Human participants (n = 435) donated blood samples and completed a questionnaire to self-report relevant symptomology or clinical diagnosis. Among symptoms reported by participants diagnosed by licensed clinicians, headaches, high eosinophil counts, stiff neck, fatigue, and joint pain were most severe during the initial 3 months of infection. ELISA results revealed 22% of the serum samples as positive, 46% as equivocal, and 32% as negative. A subset of 186 samples was tested by dot blot, with 30% testing positive and 70% testing negative. A significantly higher mean ELISA value was found among recently (2014-2015) clinically diagnosed participants as than among those with a diagnosis before 2010 (P = 0.027). All dot-blot positives were also ELISA positive and were significantly associated with higher ELISA values compared with dot-blot negatives (P = 0.0001). These results suggest that an ELISA using crude antigen isolated from adult A. cantonensis from Hawai'i may be an effective initial screening method for estimating exposure to A. cantonensis in Hawai'i and likewise suggest that dot-blot tests using the 31-kDa antigen exhibit efficacy as a diagnostic for exposure.