Publication:
Clinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis

dc.contributor.authorPinit Nooriten_US
dc.contributor.authorBoonying Siribumrungwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherThammasat University Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherChonburi Regional Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:04:16Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:04:16Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-18en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) is common after appendectomy. This study aims to determine a clinical prediction score for SSI after appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Methods: Data from randomized controlled trial of delayed versus primary wound closures in complicated appendicitis was used. Nineteen patient- and operative-related predictors were selected in the logit model. Clinical prediction score was then constructed using coefficients of significant predictors. Risk stratification was done by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Bootstrap technique was used to internal validate the score. Results: Among 607 patients, the SSI incidence was 8.7% (95% CI 6.4, 11.2). Four predictors were significantly associated with SSI, i.e., presence of diabetes, incisional length > 7 cm, fecal contamination, and operative time > 75 min with the odds ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.2, 5.9), 2.8 (1.5, 5.4), 3.6 (1.9, 6.8), and 3.4 (1.8, 6.5), respectively. Clinical prediction score ranged from 0 to 4.5 with its discrimination concordance (C) statistic of 0.74 (95% CI 0.66, 0.81). Risk stratification classified patients into very low, low, moderate, and high risk groups for SSI when none, one, two, and more than two risk factors were presented with positive likelihood ratio of 1.00, 1.45, 3.32, and 9.28, respectively. A bootstrap demonstrated well calibration and thus good internal validation. Conclusions: Diabetes, incisional length, fecal contamination, and operative time could be used to predict SSI with acceptable discrimination. This clinical risk prediction should be useful in prediction of SSI. However, external validation should be performed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery. Vol.13, No.1 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13017-018-0186-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn17497922en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85048774873en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46586
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048774873&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleClinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048774873&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections